but GambitKing not gonna listen really.
Yeah, BUT it's FUN when HE goes INTO rant MODE and STARTS arbitrarily CAPITALIZING words IN his DIATRIBES. I THINK he's TRYING to BE more LIKE his hero CHESS_ASSASSINS. 
but GambitKing not gonna listen really.
Yeah, BUT it's FUN when HE goes INTO rant MODE and STARTS arbitrarily CAPITALIZING words IN his DIATRIBES. I THINK he's TRYING to BE more LIKE his hero CHESS_ASSASSINS. 
Cystem_Phailure, it's difficult to walk the talk and most certainly davidegpc missed this lesson anyway ...
daud2012, if this is what you understood from the previous posts, I'm afraid there are not too many thing to be added.
1.I didn't read opinions stating that nobody should criticize Silman, have you ? I also didn't read opinions that Silman is always right, have you ?
2.you seem full with hate against ones who do not share the same opinion with you; you are not able to combat their ideas, instead you're trying to combat them; you do not deserve an answer
3.same as previous point
Well, guess what?
I sent him a message, telling him I HOPE HE STAYS!
That's right!
On the other hand, though--it doesn't give him a free pass on the many users and their posts that he has either blocked or had banned, for essentially doing nothing but expressing a differing opinion...
BUT! Everyone makes mistakes--I understand this, and I don't carry a personal vendetta against Silman...
AND NEITHER DOES davidegpc!!! He has said so multiple times!
The more you talk about 'trolls', etc. ... the more you show your own inability to come up with any other coherent argument. If any of you REALLY detested censorship, you would be willing to TAKE THE RISK and PROTEST instead of just sitting back on the side of the 'authoritative majority'... I guess taking risks like this is what playing gambits in chess is all about, ha ha!
Anyways, I actually pity all those here who blindly follow whatever the administration says... we need to quit being 'sheep' and start exercising our RIGHTS as chess.com users! WE are the force that keeps this site running, and this goes double for a PAYING MEMBER such as davidegpc! How dare you insinuate that he doesn't have a right to raise valid questions on a site that he is spending quite a bit of money for access to premium features on?
Who did Silman have banned simply for expressing an opinion?
Thanks chaps for answering my question I now have a view from both sides, However I notice someone has asked Who did Silman have banned, Thanks once again for your time. Clive.
davidegps has all the rights to raise valid questions as long as he is changing his "8 years old" approach
Who is "davidegps" ??? Whoever he is, I get the idea that basically you're saying that he has all the rights to raise valid questions *if* he uses an approach *you* respect!
*excuuuse me, princess!*
yep he is asshole for sure.
I would say, "It takes one to know one", but I believe that it's inappropriate to conduct unfounded personal attacks in a public forum... even if it seems that most others don't abide by this standard!
but GambitKing not gonna listen really.
Yeah, BUT it's FUN when HE goes INTO rant MODE and STARTS arbitrarily CAPITALIZING words IN his DIATRIBES. I THINK he's TRYING to BE more LIKE his hero CHESS_ASSASSINS.
Apparently, you can't understand what I'm saying, despite the fact that I haven't ever criticised your methods of communication, or personally attacked your perspective! Furthermore, I haven't even used all caps once in this post, so the jokes on you!
Ha ha, you only wish that you were as popular as Chess_Assassins, or had gathered the strongest team at Chess.com, like he has! Good for him! I bet he's got a lot more charisma, and says a lot less pedantic rubbish, than some others who criticise him!
are they related ?
But no, I'm not related to him... in fact, I got removed by Fred from the "Original Assassins" when I applied to join, ha ha! But he's still an interesting fellow...
Who did Silman have banned simply for expressing an opinion?
A better question is, "Who *didn't* Silman have banned simply for expressing an opinion?"
!!!
Answer the question.
Silman deleted a comment that selfmate made about him - it began a heated discussion. The point is, Silman is allowed to delete what he wants on his article, but the debate is ethically, it didn't make sense - some said he was being rude to another's critique of him. Personally, I think he was just joking, having fun, and someone got their feelings hurt. But another person posted a comment that Silman deleted, and it started a backlash from many people.
but GambitKing not gonna listen really.
Yeah, BUT it's FUN when HE goes INTO rant MODE and STARTS arbitrarily CAPITALIZING words IN his DIATRIBES. I THINK he's TRYING to BE more LIKE his hero CHESS_ASSASSINS.
Furthermore, I haven't even used all caps once in this post, so the jokes on you!
???? Who said all caps? I said you capitalize arbitrary words. Score you a perfect zero for reading comprehension.
As for me wanting to be more popular or have a stronger group than someone else, the correct deduction from the fact that I haven't started any group would be that I have no interest in running a group. I've never been able to get too fired up about the importance of being popular among a group of total strangers in cyberspace that I'll never meet in real life.
that does't mean a swat shit or it could mean that you did bugger all Gambitking.
I rest my case...
WHAT A YOUNGBLOOD, ha ha!
Score you another perfect zero for comprehension. In case you aren't aware, member points are not popularity trophies. I get my member points by posting witty comments. You get yours by posting bombastic crap with arbitrarily capitalized words. 
Not the least interested. I play chess for fun, and playing you wouldn't be fun. I only duel in the forums.
As I already mentioned, nobody is deafer than the one who doesn't want to hear and obviously you are not ready to listen to anything that doesn't share your opinion. You're just avoiding to stick to the point and you're digressing in order to flame.
Both you and daud2012 are combating the guys expressing different ideas instead of combating their ideas. What can I say to a guy that is judging me after the country I live in, or gratulates me considering that I write "infantile comments which just show how you will never reach adulthood" ? What to write to someone who consider all the ones with different opinion to be "people rated between 1200 and 1500", "herd of sheep" and insinuate that his opponents are not using their brains ? IMO, he really doesn't deserve an answer.
Coming back to you, I just want to repeat what I wrote in a previous post:
It seems very childish to me to assume and affirm that others "are not willing to take any risk" and "blindly follow whatever the administration says". Please let me understand your allegations correctly, whoever doesn't share your opinion is a chicken s***t who just want to be driven by the mighty admins ? Where and which are the claimed risks that you are facing, 'cause I really-really don't see them and who from the admins told us what to think ?
Yeah, for the past few months this coward has only been playing tournaments and an occasional team match if the opponent is from a country that isn't already on my list. Actually, at the moment my games are vacationed because I screwed up a few days ago and lost track of the time left on a game and my auto-vacation kicked in (that's the first time I've messed up like that), and I decided as long as all the games kicked over to vacation anyway, I'd take a few days off. But I'll get back into them in a day or two and quickly return to my losing ways. 
I'm afraid you're right kco, but I felt a strong need to express myself regarding his "deafness", the "risks" facing while expressing your opinion and the rest ...