erik? are you out there?
erik, we are frustrated
Sort:
well, dustin, it would be nice to have a conversation with erik about the aforementioned issues. if you see him can you tell him to stop ignoring us?
Sep 30, 2019
0
#84
Sorry to tell you but this whining is not worthy of the chiefs attention. You're like the one guy with a homemade sign in front of the white house.
forked_again wrote:
Sorry to tell you but this whining is not worthy of the chiefs attention. You're like the one guy with a homemade sign in front of the white house.
That's not a very good analogy. It's more like the one guy with a homemade sign in front of the police station.
forker, patriot, you two can keep slurping.....
until the site's functions affect you.
really, quite childish to make assumptions about me and all the others that are concerned.
if you are fine with everything, no need to post here.
AlCzervik wrote:
forker, patriot, you two can keep slurping.....
until the site's functions affect you.
really, quite childish to make assumptions about me and all the others that are concerned.
if you are fine with everything, no need to post here.
Well you have a point. As I said before, if there is a red flag, warning, or limitation, then it's an "improvement". You are justified in complaining about it, but like the lone guy with the sign in front of the police station, nobody cares.
You are right, until it affects me....
Well, it will never affect me. V3 took care of that. V3 was sort of a way of saying "we dont want your business". Sure I could have complained about it, but I didn't want to be that person with the sign in front of the police station. It's not a big deal. If affects you because you play here. That is your choice. My choice is to not let it affect me.
Hi Al, maybe you want to talk about why is this frustrating for you?
patriot, it's not just the shenanigans about play. i've had two topics about v3 failures that included a lot more than just game situations.
consider what you write for a moment. you did not like v3, but, instead of saying anything about it, you say nothing so others don't look at you wrong. perhaps if there were enough people writing about the massive fails of v3, we wouldn't be here with this "lone guy in front of the police station".
you strike me as one that never votes but complains about the pols.
if i'm wrong about you, so be it. this topic is directed to erik, anyhow.
Uke8 wrote:
Hi Al, maybe you want to talk about why is this frustrating for you?
perhaps read the op?
sorry, this was kinda personal question about the frustration part, not the improved tech features.
meaning... implementing new features force us to modify behavior, and some people feel frustration from changes in general. right? is that it?
another example may be that u feel cc should consult with its members about how to manage it, and you feel left out?
I dunno! that's why i asked you. but maybe its too personal to bring up in a public setting?
read the thread, uke.
ok, good night
Sep 30, 2019
0
#95
. perhaps if there were enough people writing about the massive fails of v3, we wouldn't be here with this "lone guy in front of the police station".
Perhaps, but there aren't. That should tell you something. Don't delude yourself to think you are part of some silent majority lol.
Sep 30, 2019
0
#96
at another part of town ...
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/erik-we-are-as-pleased-as-punch
courtesy of
Sep 30, 2019
0
#97
Uke8 wrote:
sorry, this was kinda personal question about the frustration part, not the improved tech features.
meaning... implementing new features force us to modify behavior, and some people feel frustration from changes in general. right? is that it?
another example may be that u feel cc should consult with its members about how to manage it, and you feel left out?
I dunno! that's why i asked you. but maybe its too personal to bring up in a public setting?
dr phil in da haus
lol, here's one for you bunny
forker, thanks again for visiting!
this topic is not about you. do you see forker in the title? perhaps if you had specific insight into the questions asked i would consider your input valuable.
for your limited information, i have started other topics where many others have issues similar to mine, and the topics then reveal additional issues brought forward by other members. the fact that a large majority of these issues are ignored is why i'm asking the site owner directly.
did you miss where i've not received answers in other topics?
did you not read when i wrote of three tickets sent with no response?
did you not read about the member locked out of live chess with no explanation?
am i going too fast for you?
all rhetorical questions, really. if you did not post here anymore it would be just fine with me.
Savage47 wrote:
There is a substantial amount of precedent (and actual written law) regarding forum posts. I'm completely right regardless of your understanding of it.
Given that you are the only person here espousing this notion, perhaps it's actually your understanding that is faulty? Just a thought. Feel free to post some actual facts that support your position.
I m not frustrated at all...this site is a great site even for freeriders like me...the severs here are awesome...they remember everything you ever did ...now that is amzing