First!

What is up with people who say "First!" or "First page!" in the Daily Puzzle as if they won the lottery or something? I don't get it.

I don't know, I guess they have too much time on their hands.

They're retards.

You know you didn't need two deleted comment posts. You could have just edited the first one.

Wait, I won the lottery!?!! YES!!!! 25 years of powerball tickets and I've won the lottery!!!!

You'll see "Easy" a lot in the TT.

Shows how many wankers there are on here.

The DP threads since 9/10 that the first reply was "first" or something along those lines:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/9272011---mate-in-3

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/9262011---mate-in-2

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/9252011---mate-in-2

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/9232011---d-gurgenidze-1985-white-to-draw

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/9132011---mate-in-3

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/9112011---the-final-blow

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/9102011---mate-in-7

Some of them said how important being the first poster is.  Pathetic, indeed.

And that was just the first page!

Here are the ones on the second page, which brings us back to 8/21:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/982011---mate-in-4

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/952011---mate-in-2

This one, unfortunately, was from a friend of mine

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/932011---white-draws

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/922011---mate-in-9

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8312011---mate-in-3

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8292011---gurevich---short-rotterdam-1990

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8282011---mate-in-1

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8232011---check-check-mate

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8222011---mate-in-3

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8212011---double-the-fun

Also note that in later posts, some people were angry that they weren't first.

The third page, which dates back to 8/2:

I don't know what the first poster said here:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8162011---mate-in-2

In this one, the "first" was hidden in white text:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8122011---mate-in-6

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/8102011---m-mcnabb---a-kulashko-auckland-2000

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/882011---mate-in-2

In here, the first poster didn't say "first", but on Post 3, someone tries to take measures against first posters:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/862011---going-to-the-edge-and-back

In this one, the first poster was against someone posting first.  Kudos to them:

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/852011---mate-in-7

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/daily-puzzles/832011---mate-in-3

That post was the first time I considered doing a facepalm.

I swear to Saint Clare, wankers, wankers EVERYWHERE!

20th?

Another strong waste of bandwidth.