It moves slowly, so you can just set 1 minute time controls and outlast it. Not really beating it but its possible.
Has anyone ever beat the "Maximum" 3200 bot?

Magnus HAS REACHED AN ELO OF 3000 So Maybe One day as @Spr_chess_intermediate">@Spr_chess_intermediate Said?

no you didnt.
How do you mean? I found a way to trap its queen. Don't believe if you don't want to.

no you didnt.
How do you mean? I found a way to trap its queen. Don't believe if you don't want to.
Good. Because I choose not to. I highly doubt you could beat me, let alone a maximum depth bot.
--------------
Fine with me. I doubt I could beat you in one attempt either. But I've been playing the maximum bot for about half a year figuring out a way to beat it. As you can observe from that game I shared, the way I beat it is totally "unconventional" way to play chess. That is, I'd not given up pieces for free to you the way I fed them to the bot. I also win 2900 bot with that opening with 16+ advantage.
https://www.chess.com/game/computer/115481011
Good luck, disbeliever!

bro, you never beat it, the only bot you beat was erin-bot

Link for beating maximum 3200 bot.
I anaylsed the full game with stockfish, and all the moves were either the top 1st or top 2nd move suggested by the computer which is suspicious.
On move 21. cxd4, all beginners rated his rating, including me when anaylsing, will recapture the pawn, but he/she played b4 which was the top 1 stockfish move, which no 600-700, not even a 2000 master could find it, which is also suspicious.
On move 27, who 691 plays Be2 in the opening, and Be3, just to trade rooks, the top 1 stockfish move again, which I don't even understand.
On move 29, if you decline a rook trade, no 691 plays Rb1 to expand on the queenside or whatever reason suggested by top 1 stockfish choice.
On move 31, who sacs the pawn with a4 for nothing, the top stockfish move again, which I guess only GM's and computers can play.
And then after that, there was no move by white which was not the top 1 stockfish move and there were many points where absurd moves were played and I don't want this message to be long, so that's it!
So I guess he/she should be reported! Thanks!
*scrolling thru the comments (?) *
*sees this*
dude, you shouldn't be reported for using computer against computer....
his account is closed he wont see this

I mean, there is the game that I created over several months of playing the maximum computer. Speaking of rating, my rapid rating is little to none of your concern here. I have 7 victories against computer (2500) with this opening besides victory of 2900 and 3200. I have several retries of that game and it is a solid strategy against Maximum. If you really watching the game, you can see that the moves I make are not the kind any sort of engine would provide for you, since giving away a bishop for free is a 'mistake' from the engine's perspective. The way I made it was due to the fact that Maximum computer always plays the same 'best' game it comes up with for any given opening. Thus I was able to replay the same game at least a couple hundreds of times until I figured the way to beat it. And claiming that I cheated through it is somewhat unwise and indecent, I've been working hard to make it work. So, unless you go ahead and prove that I cheated here, be so kind as to refrain from further insults over my rating. Thanks. Since I know the entire game in advance, that's how I play against it. https://youtu.be/oscuihWA66s

no you didnt.
How do you mean? I found a way to trap its queen. Don't believe if you don't want to.
Good. Because I choose not to. I highly doubt you could beat me, let alone a maximum depth bot.
Fine with me. I doubt I could beat you in one attempt either. But I've been playing the maximum bot for about half a year figuring out a way to beat it. As you can observe from that game I shared, the way I beat it is totally "unconventional" way to play chess. That is, I'd not given up a pieces for free to you the way I fed them to the bot. I also beat 2900 bot with that opening 16+ advantage.
Good luck, disbeliever!
Dude, you have a 1200 rapid rating after 400 games. It's not just me. There is not one player on this site with even a half of a brain in his head that thinks you could beat a maximum strength bot no matter how many tries you take.
---------
A little something for you to think about. I have the rating of 300 in 'Chess Ultra' on my console. It doesn't change the fact that I beat the top difficulty bot in there, recordings are on the same channel from the previous post.

no you didnt.
How do you mean? I found a way to trap its queen. Don't believe if you don't want to.
Good. Because I choose not to. I highly doubt you could beat me, let alone a maximum depth bot.
Fine with me. I doubt I could beat you in one attempt either. But I've been playing the maximum bot for about half a year figuring out a way to beat it. As you can observe from that game I shared, the way I beat it is totally "unconventional" way to play chess. That is, I'd not given up a pieces for free to you the way I fed them to the bot. I also beat 2900 bot with that opening 16+ advantage.
Good luck, disbeliever!
Dude, you have a 1200 rapid rating after 400 games. It's not just me. There is not one player on this site with even a half of a brain in his head that thinks you could beat a maximum strength bot no matter how many tries you take.
---------
A little something for you to think about. I have the rating of 300 in 'Chess Ultra' on my console. It doesn't change the fact that I beat the top difficulty bot in there, recordings are on the same channel from the previous post.
you did not. and everyone here knows it.
-----
Know all you want. I have the game right here with recordings on YouTube. Jealousy speaks through you. Without any proof on your behalf, you're just mocking at someone's success.
Here, enjoy.
It is impossible without using stock fish even for magnus.