He isnt even rated in Tactic trainers?
dude do some research before you make fault statements.
He deleted his TT rating when people discovered his awesome rating :)
Maybe he did like 4 attempts and that got him 1600 then he stopped?
Nope, I can't remember the exact number, but he had solved by far enough problems to get an accurate rating.
Nuclear..
wouldnt he be banned by now? -.-
You gotta think things through.. -.-
If they catch 2300 rated engine users, and yet Ouachita is Number 1, they probably looked at all of his games and found out he isnt cheating.. -.-
They wouldnt let him slide, and he stands out the most due to the fact that he's #1..
Nuclear..
wouldnt he be banned by now? -.-
You gotta think things through.. -.-
If they catch 2300 rated engine users, and yet Ouachita is Number 1, they probably looked at all of his games and found out he isnt cheating.. -.-
They wouldnt let him slide, and he stands out the most due to the fact that he's #1..
Well you'd think wouldn't you, but apparently not. Chess.com seems to pick and choose which cheaters to ban. Join the "Cheating Discussion" group and read the "Ouachita" thread. If he isn't cheating then no one is.
Also you do know it's against the rules to put false info on your profile "Mr Johnson PHD"?
Mr. Johnson
United States 
Rating: 2953
omg 50 away
lol SerbianChessStar, why would you send me a message asking for a link to the Cheating Discussion Forum when you've blocked me from sending you messages? 
Here it is anyway: Cheating Discussion
lol SerbianChessStar, why would you send me a message asking for a link to the Cheating Discussion Forum when you've blocked me from sending you messages?
Here it is anyway: Cheating Discussion
My bad.. i was mad at you the other day i blocked you, but ill unblock you. :P
Your only rated 2000 blitz in live chess
and 2150 in online chess :o
I played only 6 games from the beginning, I won all of them, but it wasn't enough to get higher.
i would be willing to play ouchita a few 1-minute games on live, and im only 1800 in 1 minute.
i would be willing to play ouchita a few 1-minute games on live, and im only 1800 in 1 minute.
good man. I daresay NM Ozzie would have a go too, he's a pretty strong bullet player and could probably make a fight of it.
i would be willing to play ouchita a few 1-minute games on live, and im only 1800 in 1 minute.
good man. I daresay NM Ozzie would have a go too, he's a pretty strong bullet player and could probably make a fight of it.
I'd like to play NM Ozzie as well :P
Have you had the game yet? I'd like to watch if you know when you're going to play.
he wrote a message "lets try live chess" to me a few minutes ago...I wonder if he's saying it seriously
Read from bottom to up. My last message was sent almost an hour ago and I didn't get an answer...
From: Kacparov
To: ouachita
Date: Oct 18, 2009 @ 8:02pm
Subject: Re: chess
no way I play up to 3 minutes as I said
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Message by 
ouachita on 10/18/2009 @ 10:51am:
30+5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Message by 
Kacparov on 10/18/2009 @ 10:49am:
what time control?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Message by ouachita on 10/18/2009 @ 10:48am:
now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Message by Kacparov on 10/18/2009 @ 10:43am:
when?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Original Message by ouachita on 10/18/2009 @ 10:36am:
lets try live chess
The critics and fanboys all alike need to check the evidence.
Mr. Collyer has researched not only 20 of 'chita's games, and not only the games of the Fischer-Spassky 1972 match and the Capablanca-Alekhine match, but the games of the pre-computer era correspondence champions Estrin, Boey, Zagarovsky, Palciauskas as well.
That analysis is here:
http://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/fritz-xi-top-3-matchup-benchmark-stats
http://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/ouachita (page 8)
None of them--repeat NONE OF THEM--are as good as 'chita. Not even the correspondence world champions who had no access to computers for analysis, as no one here is supposed to have.
Somehow this can be done by someone taking less than 10 minutes for 95% of his moves, as he claimed in his profile, while meeting those he says are using engines.
It´s not his fault if he is allowed to use computer assistance in this site, isn´t it?
nuclearturkey and costelus (Turkey's turkeys),
You're bad at chess, so you're probably also bad at math, but let's see if you can solve this freshman level problem:
Player A has played 211 games. Each game has lasted an average of 33 moves with an average time/move of 2 hr. 33 min. If 90% of his moves take an average of 10 min., what is the average time/move for the remaining 10% of his moves?
You must show the solution along with your answer.
Please, no help from the truly smart people here.
Whatever, you're still a scum-bag cheater. No one in history has got near the computer match up rates you have no matter how long they were taking for their moves.
Also, this time instead of replying with the usual "ROFL, you guys crack me up", how about actually giving a proper answer to this: Nostradamus Demise This is what you said: "most of my current game opponents are using engines". Considering you beat them all anyway what you have done here is the equivalent of saying "I am cheating".