is this against the rules? running the clock down

Sort:
Avatar of barzma
So this guy blunders his bishop and queen with 4:20 left on the clock of a 5 minute game. He then proceeds to let his clock run down to zero. Is this against the rules?

The game in question:

Check out this #chess game: barzma vs Wilbert_88 - https://www.chess.com/game/107570735264
Avatar of Yadav_Yogesh

It is not against the rules. After 10 moves each player can spend as much time as they want in each moves. If this was before 10 moves he would have lost due to abandonment.

Avatar of Yadav_Yogesh

But it is super annoying and disrespectful to do this as the other player have to wait for the entire time to run out so they can claim the win.

Avatar of AgileElephants

You can report your opponent:

https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8584203-what-is-stalling

https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8598007-what-is-chess-com-s-sportsmanship-policy

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
GabeMiami10 wrote:

2, it is a rule actually. the amount of moves played has nothing to do with it lol

The site has abandonment rules that prevent using too much time in the first 10 moves and that's what was being referred to.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
barzma wrote:
So this guy blunders his bishop and queen with 4:20 left on the clock of a 5 minute game. He then proceeds to let his clock run down to zero. Is this against the rules?
The game in question:
...

Players that habitually do that will get restricted and can eventually get the account closed.

https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8584203-what-is-stalling

Avatar of HumbleCrumb

This is super annoying as well if you're playing a rapid game and you have to wait 10 minutes

Avatar of checkmated0001

yes it is against the rules, yes it is completely pathetic, and yes you should report them.

Avatar of dokerbohm

his time is his time and he can do with it wherever he wants with it -- if wants to make you wait for your point then its his time to waste not yours -- so when you win or are in winning spot a sit back and relax till he runs out of time

Avatar of dokerbohm

show me the rule that states that about time ??????

Avatar of dokerbohm

maybe your right about this time upon reading some hoyes rules about chess i thought abonnement was worse than running the clock out after ten moves to end the game -- maybe iam wrong

Avatar of checkmated0001

If you abandon the game a timer automatically starts, the amount of time given varies from game to game (as an example, rapid is about 40 seconds I believe). When the time runs out, the game is considered abandoned and the person who's still online gets the win. Stalling is worse, because you don't actually leave the game. This forces the opponent to wait for the entire rest of the game ( again using rapid as an example, the rest of the game could be up to 30 minutes depending on time controls) before they actually get the win. This just wastes everybody's time, and is absolutely disrespectful to your opponent.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
GabeMiami10 wrote:

6, actually? can you send link. I've never heard or seen this before

https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8593801-how-does-game-abandonment-work

The section called Long Move Timer 

Avatar of checkmated0001

https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8598007-what-is-chess-com-s-sportsmanship-policy

Avatar of fowgre

Care to comment on my latest blog post?

Avatar of 7zx

It's not against the rules of chess but it is against chess.com's sportsmanship policy.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
bobby_max wrote:

Report them all you want; nothing will happen. CC is not interested in enhancing your user experience. But don't forget to become a paying member.

Accounts get closed for excessive stalling as described.

Avatar of JBarryChess

I have had similar happen to me a few times, but at about 2 and a half minutes. I reported all of them for stalling.