For what purpose?
And, as the horsie said, people like choice.
Personally I like -50 to +500 to ensure I get players as close to or greater than my rating as possible.
limits
Sort:
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean.
Ah. I see. Thanks. I've only every played 1 OTB tournament before.
I almost got beat by a 7 Y.O. because I didn't know K vs K+R ending.
Fortunately, I accientaly figured it out.
kleelof wrote:
For what purpose?
And, as the horsie said, people like choice.
Personally I like -50 to +500 to ensure I get players as close to or greater than my rating as possible.
Mosai wouldn't be very happy when he sees that.
macer75 wrote:
kleelof wrote:
For what purpose?
And, as the horsie said, people like choice.
Personally I like -50 to +500 to ensure I get players as close to or greater than my rating as possible.
Mosai wouldn't be very happy when he sees that.
HA! I was trying to remember who was whining about that before.
Yeah. I posted a similar message once and within minutes he started another thread complaining and used my exact range as an example.
I think he was saying something about feeling cheated because higher rated players were not giving him a chance to lose to them or something like that.
What a troll.
Uh oh... now Mosai won't be very happy when he sees that I reminded you about him.
why not fix ratings at -100 +100