People Being RUDE!!!

Sort:
ilikeflags

nice.  i gots me some readins to do

planeden
Wow, just found this one, and i want to say to ivandh - pure brilliiance. 
Karl_ wrote:Just because I differed with their opinions that all suspected cheats should be named and shamed and that all the top players are cheats. 
oh great..."guilty until proven innocent".  i can think of a few people who may use this just because they didn't like what someone said in the forums. 
PS:  i have not blocked theGrobe. 
planeden
Karl_ wrote:
 Not sure what you are getting at, you took that out of context.  The Bullies wanted all suspected (in their minds, no proof mind you) cheats named so they could insult and defame them.  I hope you don't think I wanted to do that. 

since i was not in the group i had no idea which side you were on.  i just hate guily until proven innocent.  so we seem to be on the same side of it. 

ilikeflags

i didn't learn how to whistle until i was 12.  maybe i am autistic.  and i like waffles.

theoreticalboy

Karl.  Hero, he said.

Deluded cretin; others.

....what?

planeden

if he were a hero he probably would have fought to the death...hehehe

ilikeflags

i love sour dough cretins on salad.  or rye.  yum

goldendog
Karl_ wrote:


  I made plenty of valid points about the subject matter,

Lol! Typically when you opened your mouth on the subject of Top 3 you got something wrong. You even speculated that if you got to 2500 here (!) that you would show up as a cheater. I'm not sure which is less probable.

but every time I made one they just jumped down my throat and didn't even address my points logically. 

You never were one to admit you were wrong Karl. That is part of your legacy there: Never Wrong Karl.

Just because I differed with their opinions that all suspected cheats should be named and shamed and that all the top players are cheats. 

Nope. TheGrobe is one of several who don't want anyone named until they have been called a cheater by chess.com, and he differed with you all the time in the forum on the subject of T3 method and most anything related. And of course it's a strawman argument that a group was monolithically in favor all suspected cheaters being named. That's, put kindly, just not so. Not even close.

They don't want discussion in that group, just witch hunts so they can attack any member they want to. 

Discussion is the order of the day, then and now. The simplistic reduction doesn't hold up in the light of the day, and anyone can read those discussions. I'd like to see more regard for the truth than self-serving falsehoods from some members in this thread though.

Before I was in that group, it was much worse.  They were attacking anyone they felt was a cheat, some even closed their accounts just because of the constant harassment.  And other members that saw the disgusting things they were doing closed too, just because it sickened them to see it and the site allow behavior like that.  At least I was able to help stop that before I left there. 

Who closed their account due to cheat accusation harrassment, Karl? You can't name him. You say some, but name one.


Raghav

Hello all,

I believe being it is true that sometimes people do get rude,but that didnot mean that they wanted to,specially in bullet games,when we have matches there we often noticed that people loose there self temper.so i personally believe that if you have this type of problem,then you always have the power to disable chat.

xqsme

ON SUBJECT OF RUDENESS...is it rude of me to keep trolling on site allowing TD /admins to expose lower rated players to the unfair competition of "NEWBIE" 1200 PRIVISIONALLY RATED PLAYERS who frequently turn out to be in fact accomplished players who proceed to destroy ratings of lowly players such as myself who usually occupy the foot of competition listings... why should we be exposed to this utterly unfair and unnecessary procedure when the site does not allow it to happen in site administrated competition... surely there is an oversite here since  Chess.com is responsible for all rules they set ?

goldendog

Those who know about your behavior in that group are laughing their asses off when you say, I will always admit when I am wrong.

If only that were true.

How would you know if it were being used in an incorrect manner, Karl? You never fully understood it, as evidenced by your gaffes in regard to it.

No one has claimed that T3 was a scientific tool. Red Herring.

Likewise, a tool doesn't need to be scientific to produce valid results, in this case catching the most blatant cheaters.

goldendog

"Who closed their account due to cheat accusation harrassment, Karl? You can't name him. You say some, but name one."

Still waiting. or are you "fulla"?

theoreticalboy

Yeah goldendog, still trying the old trick of trying to get someone to back up their claims with actual credible evidence.  You scumbag.

PrawnEatsPrawn
Karl_ wrote:
goldendog wrote:

"Who closed their account due to cheat accusation harrassment, Karl? You can't name him. You say some, but name one."

Still waiting. or are you "fulla"?


Still trying that old trick I see!  LOL


 

Still avoiding giving an answer?

 

Yeah, better stick to diversionary tactics, circular and nonsensical arguments and good old fashioned BS. It's all you're good for.

bigpoison

All the "bullies" are coming out to attack poor Karl_?  Where's 'flags, their fearless leader?

ilikeflags

there's a kid on the soccer team i coach who goes by the name Oso.  i call him Tortuga cuz he's so slow.  is that rude??!!

ilikeflags

bigpoison is right, i am fearless...

ilikeflags

ALMOST anyone.  almost.

PrawnEatsPrawn

Still no answer, just more bluster.

theoreticalboy

Choosing words with care

Karl defers explanation

Of what he means.  Bah.