'tis a good idea indeed! i'll add this to my list of future forum improvements.
Post multiplicity

'tis a good idea indeed! i'll add this to my list of future forum improvements.
Just how long is that list? XD

good idea as long as the topic gets put into public view. i start topics to get into active "conversations" with other members, even though the topics have been reviewed before, i want to actively participate in a discussion not passively read what others have already said. if space is a problem then erase forums that nobody has touched in a set amount of time (say 3 months). if space isnt a problem then let people start forums and if you dont want to participate in the discussion, then you have the ability to just skip over it and go on to something else...
I've been a member of chess.com for around eight months now, and only one problem has persisted during that time. I frequently visit the forums on this site, and the most severe annoyance to me is seeing forum topics that have been posted several times before posted anew by another member. (i.e. knight vs. bishop, is chess a game or a sport, problems with live chess, tactics vs. strategy, etc.)
Back in the day when I played video games like Delta Force and America's Army, I belonged to several clans who sponsored their own website. One notable aspect of these websites was that before posting a new topic, members had to read all the 'Sticky' topics and the rules for posting. However, a more effective method was developed, namely, after a member entered a title for their forum topic, (i.e. "Disconnection Problems") a listing of similar topics appeared in a search box on the post page, and a message appeared asking if any of these topics satisfyed the user's question.
I realize that there are ways around a backstop like this, such as using nonsense subject lines, or simply ignoring the message, but could this be an effective implementation on chess.com? I'm open to thoughts and opinions (and I sincerely hope no one has posted this topic before, because then I would look like an idiot)