Reaching an high score is riskful?

I have started chess on this site, i was "only" 1100 elo but in few time i started learn more and more playing sometimes also 20 rapid games per day. I reached 2000 in around 1 year but my progress got slowed, the journey seems being more difficult. Players are strong at that level but a plague that starts appear it's also cheating. But after months and months i got able to reach 2300. I always thought that i can reached 2500-2600 elo with extreme determination, training and pratice but when finally in this Holiday i strike the 2400 for my first time i had a doubt. In these recent days i see how many Gm's accuse of cheating another Gm's that are at very high level also OTB. And in my case i am just around #80 on World and i am not anymore so far to reach the IM/GM level. At 2400+ Cheaters seems finally "disappear" or at least they got closed very soon, so there anymore obstacles. I want in particolar the answers of some masters or Staff of chess.com, to this question:"Is safe to reach an high score?" I have never cheated in a single game on my more 8500 games and i will never but sometimes i think that for rivality someone close also innocent people. I read the licenze and says that if a GM want to close your account, he can, also without controll your games, right? Thanks in advance

Edit. I have started play also OTB tournaments in FIDE but needs more time to reach my real score, for the moment 1898.

Thank you for your advice, also may I ask how old you are?

he's 17, we were schoolmates, he's a genius fr

This is one of the craziest chess progressions ive ever seen, but closing in on 1st place.

Congrats. Your progress is impressive. I think most players have a sense of when other players cheat. And chess.com won't just kick you out without a reason... So no worries.

Truly exceptional performance. You won't get closed if you don't cheat. Although in some cases you might get caught with fake fairplay ban, never get demotivated. Create a new account and continue your journey. We have to realise that everyone makes mistakes and chesscom can too.

Wow you must be very talented! You should definite start doing more official offline tournaments and see what your full potential is

@MYSTERIOUSGENIUS000, @Optimissed's answer was nonsense. The goal of chess is to play in such a way against your opponent that you get the result. The aim is not to play in such a way that you get approval from spectators, nor is to play in such a way that a computer gives you a high accuracy number.

You are the #80 highest rated rapid player on the site. That means your play is exceptionally good - better than most of the FIDE titled players with active rapid ratings. For example, there is an NM, 2 IMs and a GM between you and #100 on the rapid ranking.

What do you mean by "going to an academic"?

Dont be too harsh with yourself!! The strongest fellow at mind games it is a human animal from india no sorry he is from eastern islands and it is 8500. He never comes to play for Fide and is afraid to come to europe due to cheating. He cant support cheating league

I can confirm that @Optimissed thinks he is cleverer than me.

The ranking is what it is. FIDE rankings also span a range of time controls, so you would have to say they are not really rankings either.

To be #80 in a system that split 10 0 and 15 10 could be easier as you would have a smaller active pool (people tending to play their preferred time controls and avoid others entirely. My rapid used to be based on longer time controls, it is all 10 0 recently, although that is less to my strengths.

10 0 seems very leisurely to people who play fast games. Very un-blitz like, which is why they moved it.

You will find a lot of people think like me that 10 0 is not blitz-like these days. It would only seem so to someone who plays mostly slower time controls, which is probably a minority (more so at high ratings, for sure).

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/98560499687?tab=review&move=53

I certainly didn't claim 10 0 was "a waste of time"! Rather it seems quite leisurely to a blitz player used to playing much faster time controls. It should be possible to play significantly better chess as a consequence (but some seem to benefit less from the extra time).

Yes, looking again I somehow misread that. Sorry for that.

The OP's rating is a true rating for the band of time controls classified as rapid on chess.com. It would be reckless to assume he would be worse at slower time controls within the band since he is much higher rated in rapid than in blitz. Such a difference tends to be extrapolated (look at my ratings for an increasingly extreme version - I think that is partly age-associated!)

Hi MysteriousGenius000! First of all, you are doing great! You are the 68# best rapid player, better than many titled players. Now, how do you practice chess?

No, it couldn't. What time controls do you think those players are playing? Take the FM who is now ranked just below the OP (who has risen to #67). All his last 5 rapid games have been 10 minute. You can be sure that to this lightning and blitz playing FM 10 0 feels like quite a slow time control. He happens to be a couple of hundred points higher rated at blitz.

Note that I am not disagreeing that 10 0 is quite different to say 15 10, but it's all a matter of degree and the divisions are quite arbitrary. I think they changed because there was a desire that 10 0 be separated from "true blitz".