Everyone should be more tolerant , like me ! 
Response from Caught Cheater - Worth Reading
Sort:
Aug 13, 2009
0
#303
Reb wrote:
Everyone should be more tolerant , like me !
May the chess gods be with us... 
Aug 13, 2009
0
#304
Reb wrote:
Everyone should be more tolerant , like me !
Cats inspire tolerance. They don't believe in making a fuss over nothing.
You can tolerate something, and still know that it is stupid, annoying, and silly.
Right, Rex?
Suggo wrote:
Kupov wrote:
erik wrote:
no more personal attacks in here. behave.
There was more to the quoted post originally...but it appears to have been deleted! 
bigpoison wrote:
You can tolerate something, and still know that it is stupid, annoying, and silly. Right, Rex?
Exactly !
Reb wrote:
bigpoison wrote:
You can tolerate something, and still know that it is stupid, annoying, and silly. Right, Rex?
Exactly !
that is madness...
hello erik
i sent u a question maybe u didnt get it or dont know answer
i asked if i am playing a fast game say 1min i am allowed to make some moves whitout wating for my or oppenents clock
am i also allowed to hold my peice with mouse and move it to a new point
WAIT for my clock to start OR WAIT for my oppenent clock to stop and them just drop my peice
i king of estimate the other players move a some time i loose cause
my moves a mistake but thats life u cant get every thing
If I understand correctly, you're asking if it's allowed for you to hold your peice over a square so that you can immediately drop it as soon as you're opponent has moved minimizing the amount of time that comes of your clock?
Given that there is a feature that you can turn on (Pre-Move) that will even enable you to drop the piece in advance of your opponent making their move I don't think that it's a problem. You might even want to try turning on the Pre-Move feature -- it will ensure that no time comes off of your clock.
Aug 13, 2009
0
#311
xbigboy wrote:
Reb wrote:
bigpoison wrote:
You can tolerate something, and still know that it is stupid, annoying, and silly. Right, Rex?
Exactly !
that is madness...
I second that....
TheGrobe wrote:
You might even want to try turning on the Pre-Move feature -- it will ensure that no time comes off of your clock.
As I understand it, Pre-Move still uses a fractional amount of time.
TheGrobe wrote:
If I understand correctly, you're asking if it's allowed for you to hold your peice over a square so that you can immediately drop it as soon as you're opponent has moved minimizing the amount of time that comes of your clock?
Given that there is a feature that you can turn on (Pre-Move) that will even enable you to drop the piece in advance of your opponent making their move I don't think that it's a problem. You might even want to try turning on the Pre-Move feature -- it will ensure that no time comes off of your clock.
I thought this as well and messaged him about premove an hour ago, but he shot back a reply that this is not what he is talking about. He kind of seems like he is on a parallel universe or something.
Nytik wrote:
TheGrobe wrote:
You might even want to try turning on the Pre-Move feature -- it will ensure that no time comes off of your clock.
As I understand it, Pre-Move still uses a fractional amount of time.
Is that right? I've never actually used it, so I guess I just assumed that it was zero due to the numerous threads where people have mistaken the use of pre-move with "clock manipulation" because "no time game off of my opponents clock!".
Aug 13, 2009
0
#315
Do parallel universes exist? I've heard of the bubble theory but would bubbles be considered parallel or one in the same since they are part of each other?
Well the idea of parallel universes seems to imply that they'd never meet so if simsim50 is coming across somehow through the ether it's likely not from a parallel universe.
I'd buy perpendicular....
ChessDweeb wrote:
xbigboy wrote:
Reb wrote:
bigpoison wrote:
You can tolerate something, and still know that it is stupid, annoying, and silly. Right, Rex?
Exactly !
that is madness...
I second that....
How so?
Aug 13, 2009
0
#319
bigpoison wrote:
ChessDweeb wrote:
xbigboy wrote:
Reb wrote:
bigpoison wrote:
You can tolerate something, and still know that it is stupid, annoying, and silly. Right, Rex?
Exactly !
that is madness...
I second that....
How so?
If you have a thorn in your foot, you pull it out. If you have cancer, you try to kill it before it kills you. If your significant other abuses you, you should leave. If your best friend keeps farting while you play video games, don't invite him back. This list can go on forever. The things that people tolerate can ruin their lives and make them miserable. Even the stupid and silly ones. So eliminate the problem.
no more personal attacks in here. behave.
... or we all go to the principal's office
