deleted

3 men, a boy & a bunny.  i think lewis is 11-12.

but snitches get stitches ...

Oh, I get it now. Auto is supporting 2Q activity,out of ignorance, I can only suppose. I do NOT make assumptions, my evidence is based on empirical evidence of observable behavior.  Upcoming is a post by a CC mod, describing the situation. 

where did you even get the idea that i support 2q?

there definitely seems to be an insurgence of accounts here who play out like tape recorders, just repeating, not listening nor learning.  and tp, you seem to be 1 of them.

I have closed this new iteration of your accounts, 2q, but have left this particular thread up to post this response.

Of course there are other people besides 2q who are permanently banned, some of whom persist in trying to sneak back in just as frequently. Most of them have enough sense to realise that they're just wasting their time & energy trying to fight Chess.com on the matter.

2q has in fact been given multiple chances to change his behaviour and be allowed to change his ways, and has repeatedly demonstrated an inability to do so - even in this latest account he is both lying about who he is, trolling the community by posting insults about WGMs, and pretending to be the victim instead of the perpetrator. He responded to his initial warnings by creating new accounts to continue the same behaviour and, when we closed those accounts, creating yet more new accounts and posting pornographic pictures multiple times from multiple new accounts. He's posted videos insulting Chess.com staff and often posts disparaging comments about our site and the people in it. He's posted instructions on how to get hold of old accounts like this one.



He has never shown any genuine contrition, nor has he demonstrated any capacity to change. His "apologies" have been superficial and accompanied by the same sort of troll fishing behaviour that led to his initial muting.



It is clear that it is not about chess: it is about the attention that he gets and somehow continues to get from people. I am therefore adopting a new approach: we are not going to give him this attention any more. Any threads asking about who he was or is will be deleted and I will send this reply to the OP via a PM so they can see for themselves. If I see any references to 2q, I will delete them. Let's see how we go with this.

Thanks,

David, moderator


Thats the best message I ever got. Brought a tear to my eye.

had already seen that - was there when it happened.  put a pause on the tape recorder.

also a repeat cancer survivor?

Trolls will be trolls, some to a bigger extent than others. 2Q was the king , scm an imitator. Both exposed as cheaters. The cheating is but the sad part, the mockery of chess is the concern.

Titled_patzer, you need better ways to spend your time. Complaining about chess.com trolls isn't very productive and as you say "it will lead you down a path you wish you've never taken."

Also, you've never given me an example where people are justifying SCM's cheating

Nope. I disagree. Some of the current trolls are in fact 2Q ! Besides, his level of mockery is unsurpassed, even had 1 or 2 mod's on his side because they were fooled ! 

2Q was the King. Only Imitators exist now. 

With better detection/deletion he will never be equaled.  Who can claim 1000+ accounts ? Nobody.

Stick to your 1 liners !

Any one who  might think that puddy cat is 2Q surely needs their head examined !

He's not condoning his engine use. No one is saying "superchessmachine should come back because cheating isn't that bad!" Some are upset superchessmachine (that people considered a "friend") is now banned.

Please, Titled_patzer, I'm begging you to show me where you found the "chess.com was going to take some chess.com troll to court."

2Q's actions, by the attacks and threats on staff, were considered to be actionable by a member of staff, quite some time ago, stands by itself.  NonSequiter7's demand to present "evidence" is nothing more than folly, a pointless attempt. Take it or leave it. Point is, harassment will reach a breaking point. That point is set quite high by most standards here, as the bottom line is membership numbers.

"He's not condoning his engine use. No one is saying "superchessmachine should come back because cheating isn't that bad!" Some are upset superchessmachine (that people considered a "friend") is now banned." - NonSequiter7

Hypocrite. You are the 1st to SLAM members who are not your friends for cheating.

Of course I have been here before. I play my chess elsewhere now. Make no bones about it. I'm on a crusade of sort, posting in the forums, to revive the "spirit of chess". Quite possibly, if CC (a great site) changed a few policies, I'd consider once again paying for membership.

I 've played 1000's of games here, correspondence and rapid for many a year, with but one account. Signed up anew with my Title !

When have I ever done so? I don't like cheating and I don't like SCM for doing so. Unlike you, I don't care about stuff like this since I have other things to do in my life. I don't blow things out of proportion like you do. I don't SLAM people for cheating. I've encountered many cheaters online whether it be chess or video games. I don't like that they do so but I don't have a mental breakdown if they cheat.

Hey. You don't "care about cheating". So be it. No problem here.

I am easily found. 2100 correspondence, 1900 rapid. An honest player who enjoys the game. Lousy connection, panics in time trouble, win/lose/or draw will be back tomorrow.