Oh god yes.
justice_avocado, you are my hero and I am with you. HEIL!
shun!! shun the unbelievers!!!
Sort:
aw
I think we should ban all non-premium members, after a thirty day grace period just to try out the site.
This is one funny thread!!!
is there anyone who should not be banned?
I think we should ban people who post banning posts about banning other people, because if all they care about is banning people, then they should be banned.
Are you CRAZY!?!? Ban people for their ACTIONS!!!Not their SCREENAME!! Even reading this makes me FURIOUS!!!Way too strict to even consider it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ziggy0076 wrote: is there anyone who should not be banned?
Ziggy please, if you are going to change the subject please create another thread.
?????????????????
how is that changing the subject?
I have a number in my name, and also capitalization; will you ban me too? My avatar is a symbol (debian) and my location is unclear; will that cause my banning?
no , they are just crazy!!!!!!
how come a name starting with 'justice_' was allowed in the first place? He will be adjudicating his own games next ...
ziggy0076 wrote:
?????????????????
how is that changing the subject?
This is a thread about who should be banned and you tried to change the subject to who should not be banned
Everyone, please try to keep up.
Jun 12, 2008
0
#34
Mebeme wrote: Are you CRAZY!?!? Ban people for their ACTIONS!!!Not their SCREENAME!! Even reading this makes me FURIOUS!!!Way too strict to even consider it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Actions? Fine. People who include chains of repeated emoticons in their posts: BANNED!!
Dr_Doc_MD wrote:
...
Are there any other specifications necessary for banning that I have missed?
Over-use of emoticons and punctuation -- that's got to be a banning.
normajeanyates wrote: how come a name starting with 'justice_' was allowed in the first place? He will be adjudicating his own games next ...
It was only allowed because it's immediately followed by 'avocado'. Any confusion about the authority the user-name may carry is quickly undermined by it's delicious, delectable absurdity.
Mebeme wrote: no , they are just crazy!!!!!!
people who use excessive faces and exclamation marks should be banned.
also people who can't spel!!!!!
there were several angry faces in mebeme's post. im not just insane.
but maybe insanity should be banned too...
I hate this thread (><) <you cant prove that is an emoticon. ha ha.
Anyone who's game play does not perfectly conform to the statistics of win/loss/draw for each opening should definitely be banned. That is clear evidence of cheating. How can you argue with statistics! Oh thats right you CAN'T! (ref: www.statisticsgods.com)
Also anyone who does not reference their posts is clearly an idea stealer trying to pass themselves off as being smarter than they are. Trying to steal credit for others hard work... thats a banning. (ref: www.pointlessposters.co.uk.org)
Here is another suggestion though - have a ban vote page. Where you can vote for or against any user being banned. (ref: www.democracyitworksbitches.com)