The Blogger Battle

Sort:
alphaous

In @Rodgy's Hot Takes thread, a question came up about who the best blogger between @Rodgy, @Lighting, and @DanielGuel was, and @Rodgy and @Lightning agreed that Daniel is the best among the three. So why am I making a thread about it if they already gave their thoughts? Because I'm bored and attention-seeki- I mean because I want to hear from the community, Daniel hasn't given his thoughts, and I want you guys to have a good time. On top of that, opinions given by someone about themselves aren't the most reliable, and @Lightning admitted he wouldn't say someone is better than him publicly. I interpret this to mean that he thinks he is the best blogger on Chess.com but just won't admit it yet. The bloggers are not allowed to vote.

 

I give my vote for @DanielGuel so the count is: 

Daniel: 1

Rodgy: 0

Lightning: 0

Lightning

lol Daniel's blogs are better

alphaous
alphaous wrote:

@Lightning admitted he wouldn't say someone is better than him publicly. I interpret this to mean that he thinks he is the best blogger on Chess.com but just won't admit it yet.

 

 

There goes my conspiracy theory. Or does it?

alphaous

You could still think that your blogs are infinitely better than everyone else's, and this is a clever smokescreen.

Lightning
alphaous wrote:

You could still think that your blogs are infinitely better than everyone else's, and this is a clever smokescreen.

Nope. I wouldn't dare say or think or believe my blogs are better than everyone else's. Fortunate to even be a top blogger

alphaous
Lightning wrote:
alphaous wrote:

You could still think that your blogs are infinitely better than everyone else's, and this is a clever smokescreen.

Nope. I wouldn't dare say or think or believe my blogs are better than everyone else's. Fortunate to even be a top blogger

I was messing with you, but you definitely deserve to be a top blogger.

alphaous

It's good, but please change the piece style, the one you are using gives me a headache when trying to focus.

alphaous

It does the opposite for me, lol.

Nimzowitsch

Welcome back @PaulMorphysBrilliant

Also, can I enter the blog battle?

alphaous

Okay.

The count is:

Daniel: 1

Rodgy: 0

Lightning: 0

ChessPawn: 0

Paul Morphy: 0

Chessking4640

@lightning 

alphaous

Daniel: 1

Rodgy: 0

Lightning: 1

ChessPawn: 0

Paul Morphy: 0

DanielGuel

@Lightning gets points for consistency. #justsaying

alphaous

You're right. You post blogs every once in a while and leave us excitedly anticipating more. * cough * PAN AMS *cough* Although Lightning has one thing going for him that could make this very interesting, even more than his consistency and humor. He has the best blog in recent Chess.com memory.

alphaous

NCP interrogation.

Lightning
DanielGuel wrote:

@Lightning gets points for consistency. #justsaying

Oh that’s nice, thanks, I’ll take it

Lightning
alphaous wrote:

You're right. You post blogs every once in a while and leave us excitedly anticipating more. * cough * PAN AMS *cough* Although Lightning has one thing going for him that could make this very interesting, even more than his consistency and humor. He has the best blog in recent Chess.com memory.

Yes that was pretty funny but idk about “best” blog

If it was best it would have been named blog of the month wink.png

alphaous

How is the Blog of the Month awarded? I thought it was given to the most viewed blog in a month.

Lightning
alphaous wrote:

How is the Blog of the Month awarded? I thought it was given to the most viewed blog in a month.

I’m not really sure tbh

I think the director of chess content or whatever usually picks the winner, but maybe there are multiple ppl who vote on it behind the scenes or something 

alphaous

If the blogs go through a judging system, then you were definitely robbed.