This site's "draw by repetition" system is retarded

Sort:
Avatar of troll_face_gaming

I was about to win by checkmate but this jerk decided to abuse the site's broken draw system. I literally had my PAWN moving forward but that's considered "rEpEtItIoN" by this site.

Avatar of MaddyCole

If you mean the entire site then yes concur

Avatar of bergez
It was by stalemate not repetition 😂
Avatar of blueemu

Your last move (40. Re7) forced the draw, by Stalemate.

The site was not retarded... I suppose delicacy forbids that I complete that sentence.

Avatar of SpacePodz
That’s stalemate lmao
Avatar of KrakeKnight0130

i was about to say that is pretty fkn retarded, but i realized it was stalemate, so now  you are the retard.

Avatar of Fixzo

lmao it literally says "Game Drawn by Stalemate" if it is at the end of the game

Avatar of Fixzo

plus if u actually took a second you'd realize that repitition means 'repeating moves', and a Repitition happens when both players repeat the same move 3 times in a row

Avatar of Fixzo
ethorson4 wrote:

plus if u actually took a second you'd realize that repitition means 'repeating moves', and a Repitition happens when both players repeat the same move 3 times in a row

nvr mind ur 500

Avatar of JackRoach

Stalemate.

Avatar of JackRoach

Before you go insulting...

Maybe read the rules.

Avatar of TheCatAce

if you moved the pawn to the top rank then you would have won the game

Avatar of Fixzo
Yurinclez wrote:

lol after you called your opponent a jerk who was abusive and said draw by repetition system is retarded... apparently its stalemate. you moved your rook to prevent draw by 3 repetitive moves but instead you got stalemate. this is one of the funniest executions in winning position i have seen in endgame.

it wouldnt be a draw by repitition bc both players have to repeat moves three times for that to happen

Avatar of DahHappyHoppyHorsi3

bruh that's a stalemate -_-

Avatar of Fixzo
Yurinclez wrote:
ethorson4 wrote:

it wouldnt be a draw by repitition bc both players have to repeat moves three times for that to happen

of course it wouldn't. its just op being afraid of something that was not gonna occur. that's why he moved the rook (believing moving that pawn once again would end up in a draw) and got a stalemate instead.

ohhh ok, it was just the way u said it sounded like the random rook move would end up being a repitition, and i dont think a 500 like him even knows wut a draw by repitition means, but i get ur point and itz still possible that he was actually looking out for that

Avatar of Ilampozhil25

no actually threefold repetiton is of positions not moves. but still, the game was drawn by stalemate.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
ethorson4 wrote:

plus if u actually took a second you'd realize that repitition means 'repeating moves', and a Repitition happens when both players repeat the same move 3 times in a row

 

It isn't repeated moves exactly, but the same position has to occur three times, including the same player to move in each position, and all legal moves possible in each., In particular castling rights the same and if en passant was possible in one of the positions, it isn't counted.

Avatar of JamieDelarosa
troll_face_gaming wrote:

I was about to win by checkmate but this jerk decided to abuse the site's broken draw system. I literally had my PAWN moving forward but that's considered "rEpEtItIoN" by this site.

You blundered into a stalemate, fool.

Avatar of llama47

This title is paired with a 400 rated OP?

What a shocker.

Avatar of NicCageCanChess
troll_face_gaming wrote:

I was about to win by checkmate but this jerk decided to abuse the site's broken draw system. I literally had my PAWN moving forward but that's considered "rEpEtItIoN" by this site.