This Website Sucks For Beginners

He seems to play on auto-pilot with plans that make no sense and then blunders massive amounts of material for move, after move, after move.  I can certainly understand why you would come to such a conclusion.

You could probably play the game of "troll or clueless newbie" and never really know. This is similar to other forums I've been on where, from time to time, you get new user asking:

• "How do I lose weight when I toooootally control what I eat but nether the less can't give you any numbers on kcal in/out or even rough estimates",
• "How do I learn effective self defense on youtube and how many month will it take",
• "I think creating a site which is a mix of facebook, tinder and youtube but in 3d/vr how do I do it and no, I haven't any experience in programming at all"

In most cases, 1 out of 100 even try to follow any advices at all. But at least other readers, who might have same questions can read it and hopefully get some value. That is what makes forum fun, we share the knowledge with everyone and not only OP.

Something I wanted to add:

When you train tactics here or on any other chess site, don't just click randomly until you get the correct move, calculate everything beforehand, and calculate all the variations. Start easy, sit on your hands or something and only move the piece when you are 100% sure this is the right combination if you do all of these and it's not the correct move! Don't worry! You're training your thought process anyways, check if you miss something, re-calculate, and correct the mistake. 

Don't calculate just one move like " Ok this is the move... and now what?"  You are not doing anything with this, you are just being lazy. Work on Mates in 2  or Mate in 1. I'm doing some composed puzzles where I set my board IRL and it's really interesting, as well as in books, it's only your mind and the paper, nothing else, no premoves, no anything.

Try to work this way with tactics, and I believe you will improve and will blunder less 2 moves sequences. Yes, I'm trash, and my rating sucks, but it's something that I'm doing right now and I swear to you guys (and girls) that this is the way and it feels really good.

3. f3 does not follow opening principles because it opens the diagonal to your king which is weakening

5. Nge2 now your white squared bishop is stuck, you should have moved it first or made a different developing move

6. Rg1 accomplishes nothing, focus on getting your bishops and knights out, where they can control the center. And allow you to castle.

9. a4 is a bad move because if you are going to castle your king is going to end up on c1, if the a pawn is on a4 then it's not doing anything to protect your king which is the goal of castling

Castling is a good thing, try to do it quickly

@ShouldBreezi I am trying to castle right away, that's what that first opening move always is. It's me trying to castle as soon as possible. 

To be fair I have a 3 crown win over Svenbot

GM's and chess engines can evaluate a position better than anyone else, but if you learn from a GM, and have them mentor you, you will become a GM.  There is no limitation to learning unless you have a learning disability, or a brain injury of some kind. 

... or lack time, money or motivation to get GM, or even any regular coach, and improve your game. And motivation is the key, if you got it or at least some need to learn chess without quitting, then you will find both time and money.

"Analysis" function can be used for free without limitation in this website. Only the "Game Review" function charges, yet one free trial per day is totally enough for improving your technique.

The low level Bots have an strange oddity that if you threaten the Queen it just gives it away - as in your game. However note that within the first 10 moves you had managed to place your Bishop is a silly place - 3. Bd3? - and give away a Knight before the Bot threw it's Queen at you.  I rather suspect that this Throw-The-Queen-Away feature is designed to compensate for horrid player game play!   Weird as it may seem if you actually had a stronger game the Bot would have giving you a tougher game. Also note that I said you should move up the Bot ratings till you find one that is an acceptable challenge.

However if this game is typical of your gameplay I rather suspect my suggestion is duff. You would be far better off working your way through a beginner's book on chess, using an appropriate Bot as a dartboard.

Excellent advice! May I also add that joining a club and/or playing in rated tournaments will help immeasurably as you will talk to others about the games that were just played. Also consider playing vote Chess to learn openings/defenses and playing in correspondence tournaments.

im not really good but my advice is look ahead

if you cant calculate blunders or something look at every single piece one by one, see where ti can move, see what it can take (protected squares) and then choose a move

then before you play it look diagonally, vertically and horizontally, and look for knights that can take it, then look back to the piece's original position and see if any pieces there are now undefended or might be captured if you move this piece 

That is why I annotated a couple of his games.  Hopefully someone will be able to benefit from it - whether it is him or someone else.

very true

Eh, it isn't even that.  It is the fact that these same questions pop up on the forums all the time and have been asked and answered dozens of times.  So, when the same kinds of questions come up and they are answered yet again, it starts to get like nails on a chalkboard.

On sites like StackExchange, if you ask a question that has already been asked, the moderators will instantly close your question as a duplicate.  The idea being that you have to be willing to do the basic work of searching for your answers before asking a question instead of being spoon-fed the answer.

This website doesn't suck for answers. I got platinum for 49 dollars and I can do infinite analysis, puzzles, and a lot of lessons per week. If you can't afford a rank I would recommend to go to Gotham Chess' youtube channel. He is an IM (International Master), and he has a lot of videos for low rated players.

If you think this website sucks, that says more about you than about the website. 

As I suggested, your comments say a lot more about you than about chess.com.  This site is probably doing just fine financially and being visited by hundreds of thousands of players daily.  Your criticisms lack specificity and while they may apply to a small percentage of players here, my experience as a beginner here was wonderful. Other players were respectful and friendly.  My impression is that the vast majority of players here are just average people who are looking for a good chess game. I'd be surprised if they were, in total, more arrogant or more anything than humans in general. Maybe you're seeing arrogance where there is none or maybe you're projecting. 
And I don't expect something for nothing. My gold membership cost of $30 per year, is peanuts compared to the value I get. 
Maybe it's a matter of attitude?