Who is Chess.com community famous?


99% of the people mentioned here aren’t famous
You only say that because you don't spend 4 hours a day spamming in off topic forums.
To the kids who do, those names are famous.

99% of the people mentioned here aren’t famous
You only say that because you don't spend 4 hours a day spamming in off topic forums.
To the kids who do, those names are famous.
True, however I believe "community famous" is more then just spam. I believe it posting relavent content that many people read. Someone who posts a blog and gets tons of views instantly, or someone who if they started coaching/streaming/something bigger then chesscom. If that would carry over with tons of chesscom viewers that’s famous imo.
Think famous like Kim Kardashian. And everything will be clear.
Here's Bill Burr's take on why women sports doesn't make as much money.

I think @Idilis is famous for being the forum observer and deliverer of bon mots and perfectly relevant short videos. He ALWAYS shows up at the EXACT right time. He said to me “I’m just a simple guy,” but I truly doubt it!
hey can you please unblock me? I was simply joking and if you notice, my account was made long before @gorbachocolate. also if I was gorba then my account would have been banned a long time ago lmao

I was literally joking, if I was gorba I would have been banned a long time ago
just look at the facts bro

Ok, @assassin3752, I’ll give u the benefit of the doubt. Hope I won’t regret it.
thanks ig

Assass has been here forever lmao
ONG these guys thinking assassin is Gorba are 🤡’s
exactly lmao

look at the facts, I have 30k points, im in like 150 clubs, and I've been here like two years longer than gorba

Gorba is a psychopath....
Why are you people giving the moron so much attention? The more attention you give him, the more rewarded he feels.
Stop feeding the troll. Ignore him.
I am regularly reading chess politics articles and for me is famous @my_good_will
He is usually in commentaries trying to politely and cultivately explain his views on discussed topics, presenting arguments with facts and sources, distinguishing opinions from facts, be objective as is in his position possible, often posting additional links with relevant info, applying critical thinking, be relatively kind even to unfriendly people... I am not saying he must be always right, but I like his approach and I mention him for that approach. If more people would do similar approach in discussions on "hot political topics", it would be for sure much more suitable place for discussion for the real purpose of discussions. And that purpose is to find some thruth or some consensus or at least to make some things clear. Not unlike what many emotionally unhandled people think, "the battlefield to overyell your sworn enemy and ~WIN~".
There are also famous wildly emotional people, who adjust their reason to be corresponding with their feelings, which they consider to be the ultimate truth, that everybody must accept, but I do not want to publish bad examples. I rather prefer principle "lead by example".