fhcfgv

Actually not very important to learn because it's a rare ending.

fhfgkfgkfgkhfk

Spoken like a true amateur!
These do actually happen and knowing this, you can also steer an endgame that way.
You have to maneuver to get the king in the corner the same color as the bishop as that's the piece to deliver mate. But the exact routine you can find in the Lessons section, or any site with chess tutorials...

According to Pritchard, a king, bishop and knight vs king ending and a king and 2 bishops vs king ending "serve only to bewilder the student. Many experienced players are unable to force the mate with bishop and knight."

i have a thing, asdfafasddadfasdf, have you heard it

Yes, I also have a rare condition stemming of the adhsfjasdhfsa in scientific terms called "adshdfshjdsfitis".

Truth. The problem is to stay under the 50-move rule. it requires surgical precision.. I can do it with the bishops though.

K+2B is fairly straightforward.  I've held games by playing the opponent (instead of the position) and slightly sacrificing to reach a K vs KNB ending where it only takes one mistake for the KNB player to end up allowing a draw due to the 50 move rule.  The threat of leaving the opponent with KNB has allowed a safer simplification in some of my games (one reason the winning KNB vs K is so rare is because the side with the advantage avoids it and ends up in other endgames that are not clearly won).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bishop_and_knight_checkmate

what you are say??

zxcvzxcvzxcvzxcvzxzcbzxcbzcbvzxcb