How can the Black side incease its advantage after White Kc1

Sort:
Dianascat

ChessSBM

I tried to follow up the engine best moves, and I got this position.

Dianascat
ChessSBM 写道:

I tried to follow up the engine best moves, and I got this position.

Thank you for your replying.Maybe bishop is a big trouble for me to deal with such a open situation.

ChessSBM
Dianascat wrote:
ChessSBM 写道:

I tried to follow up the engine best moves, and I got this position.

Thank you for your replying.Maybe bishop is a big trouble for me to deal with such a open situation.

Actually not that much trouble. The knight is for troublesome. If black just tried to be in the light squares, white’s dark bishop will be useless (Not completely useless, but white will have hard time).

fengqikun

what can iplay chess

Dianascat
ChessSBM 写道:
Dianascat wrote:
ChessSBM 写道:

I tried to follow up the engine best moves, and I got this position.

Thank you for your replying.Maybe bishop is a big trouble for me to deal with such a open situation.

Actually not that much trouble. The knight is for troublesome. If black just tried to be in the light squares, white’s dark bishop will be useless (Not completely useless, but white will have hard time).

You are right ,guy.After all i had a mega advantageof pawns.

Dianascat
fengqikun 写道:

what can iplay chess

啊这,老哥你说中文吧

OldPatzerMike
ChessSBM wrote:

I tried to follow up the engine best moves, and I got this position.

Was 5. Qb2 an engine move? It might be the best against a 3500 ELO computer, but after it the position is just lost. White has to keep the Qs on the board in order to have any chance. With Black's K in a precarious position (White threatens mate in 2), against a human I would play 5. Kb1 and hope to swindle at least a draw. Yes, I know that hope chess is normally a bad idea, but White has to take the gamble here. 5. Qb2 gives up without a fight.

Dianascat
OldPatzerMike 写道:
ChessSBM wrote:

I tried to follow up the engine best moves, and I got this position.

Was 5. Qb2 an engine move? It might be the best against a 3500 ELO computer, but after it the position is just lost. White has to keep the Qs on the board in order to have any chance. With Black's K in a precarious position (White threatens mate in 2), against a human I would play 5. Kb1 and hope to swindle at least a draw. Yes, I know that hope chess is normally a bad idea, but White has to take the gamble here. 5. Qb2 gives up without a fight.

Thank you for your replying.You mean that Kb4 is a better choice.But,5.Kb3 Qc2 6.Kb4 Qa4 7.Kc3 Qd4 8.Kd4 Then i have a double catching of Nf3 to take W's Bishop.

OldPatzerMike
Dianascat wrote:

Thank you for your replying.You mean that Kb4 is a better choice.But,5.Kb3 Qc2 6.Kb4 Qa4 7.Kc3 Qd4 8.Kd4 Then i have a double catching of Nf3 to take W's Bishop.

Not 5. Kb3, but 5. Kb1. I think Black can still win, but it's not simple. White can pose technical problems for Black to solve. A human opponent might not solve them and thus allow a draw. Very interesting position, by the way. And the question you ask -- how can Black increase the advantage -- shows an excellent thought process that will serve you well in chess.

Dianascat
OldPatzerMike 写道:
Dianascat wrote:

Thank you for your replying.You mean that Kb4 is a better choice.But,5.Kb3 Qc2 6.Kb4 Qa4 7.Kc3 Qd4 8.Kd4 Then i have a double catching of Nf3 to take W's Bishop.

Not 5. Kb3, but 5. Kb1. I think Black can still win, but it's not simple. White can pose technical problems for Black to solve. A human opponent might not solve them and thus allow a draw. Very interesting position, by the way. And the question you ask -- how can Black increase the advantage -- shows an excellent thought process that will serve you well in chess.

Maybe i can play 3.Ka1 Qc1 4.Ka2 Qa3  to break the cycle ang get three pawns with no barrier.

Dianascat
OldPatzerMike 写道:
Dianascat wrote:

Thank you for your replying.You mean that Kb4 is a better choice.But,5.Kb3 Qc2 6.Kb4 Qa4 7.Kc3 Qd4 8.Kd4 Then i have a double catching of Nf3 to take W's Bishop.

Not 5. Kb3, but 5. Kb1. I think Black can still win, but it's not simple. White can pose technical problems for Black to solve. A human opponent might not solve them and thus allow a draw. Very interesting position, by the way. And the question you ask -- how can Black increase the advantage -- shows an excellent thought process that will serve you well in chess.

Wow.If i play it,i will win without a doubt.

ChessSBM
OldPatzerMike wrote:
ChessSBM wrote:

I tried to follow up the engine best moves, and I got this position.

Was 5. Qb2 an engine move? It might be the best against a 3500 ELO computer, but after it the position is just lost. White has to keep the Qs on the board in order to have any chance. With Black's K in a precarious position (White threatens mate in 2), against a human I would play 5. Kb1 and hope to swindle at least a draw. Yes, I know that hope chess is normally a bad idea, but White has to take the gamble here. 5. Qb2 gives up without a fight.

You got a point there. The position is probably a draw, but maybe if we saved the king from the mate we can win. I am going to check the position later.

Arisktotle

 

All of your comments are based on the erroneous assumption that SF plays strong moves. In fact, in this endgame it plays the most ridiculous moves imaginable. Not weak moves, ridiculous moves as I will explain. The proper play would be 4. ... Qe2+! 5. Kb1 (for the reason given by  @OldPatzerMike) Qf1+! 6. Ka2 Qxg2+ 7. Kb1 Qc2+ 8. Ka1 Qc1+ 9. Ka2 Qxa3+! 10. Kxa3 Nc2+! and black has enough pawns!

Why does SF ignore these choices? Well, it's doesn't ignore them, it delays them! It first goes for the repetition moves hoping (how human) you make a mistake by refusing to repeat. When you keep your back straight SF will ultimately play the correct sequence I have given. Q: Why is that ridiculous? A: A human will always be happy to comply with a repetition request since white is obviously worse off. So the whole detour is just a waste of time and demonstrates SF's shortcomings in logical reasoning.