How to evaluate this position?
White should be clearly better because of the better bishop. Black's light squared bishop is hampered by his own pawns whereas white should eventually be able to use his dark squared bishop to attack the weak a3/g7 pawns.
White should be clearly better because of the better bishop. Black's light squared bishop is hampered by his own pawns whereas white should eventually be able to use his dark squared bishop to attack the weak a3/g7 pawns.
So White's plan is using his dark squared bishop to attack Black's pawns
Am I right?
So White's plan is using his dark squared bishop to attack Black's pawns
Am I right?
That's certainly one important idea although one must be careful and not to give black unnecessary counterplay while pursuing this plan. White could potentially first improve his position by playing for example h3 (to rule out Ng4) and then improve the knight with Ne2 + Nf4/d4.
So White's plan is using his dark squared bishop to attack Black's pawns
Am I right?
That's certainly one important idea although one must be careful and not to give black unnecessary counterplay while pursuing this plan. White could potentially first improve his position by playing for example h3 (to rule out Ng4) and then improve the knight with Ne2 + Nf4/d4.
you mean Ng4-Nh2/f2-Nf3/d3?
or?
Material is even but black has weak pawn on a3, which can be attacked by both white bishop and queen. On the other hand, I don’t see any succesfull attacking plan for black. I n just a few moves white should be a healthy pawn up.