Pawn talks
Sort:
Arjun_Playing
Jun 4, 2023
0
#1
Never trade pawns in the middle game or at the beginning as they are very important in endgames.
I might trade to get in a better position
Arjun_Playing wrote:
Never trade pawns in the middle game or at the beginning as they are very important in endgames.
That is logical nonsense. If trading pawns is bad for you, it is equally bad for your opponent as he is trading the same pawns. A trade can't be bad for both your endgames as the sum of your games scores will always be 1. It may increase the drawing chances (depending on ...) but that is not bad for any particular side either. Note that it is different for football where a draw can be disadvantageous to both sides as they lose a point in the sum of their game scores. But only if they are involved in a larger scale competition like a tournament!
Jun 5, 2023
0
#6
if you trade pawns at the beginning or in middle and if you loose any of your vulnerable piece and your opponent has more pieces than you,it would be difficult to win in endgames.Sometimes draws like stalemate or by insufficient material can lead to losing of points.
Your defect is in logic not in chess. Whenever you trade, both sides trade and the advantages and disadvantages are the same - on average. You need to describe specific circumstances under which trading or not trading is better for one side than for the other. You didn't provide any in your first post.
Now you change your message to "vulnerable pieces" and one side having "more pieces". Obviously when you change the story then at some point it may seem you said something sensible in the first place. But of course you didn't.
Jun 6, 2023
0
#8
Hello everyone 👋🏻,, I posted a new blog ✍️..
📢📣 How To Teach Your Kids To Play Chess ♟️: Tips For Parents --
https://www.chess.com/blog/JARVIS_SL/how-to-teach-your-kids-to-play-chess-tips-for-parents
Still not good at end game to win with just pawns
But
The person always eats my pawn 😭
Waos
Jun 7, 2023
0
#13
if it gives me a better position I will trade or move them up to be sac'd if I can create a gambit for it.
Arjun_Playing wrote:
Never trade pawns in the middle game or at the beginning as they are very important in endgames.
It doesn't really matter, because if you are down material you will lose in the endgame due to pawn promotion.
Nxijdkdhdkkshhw la yo estoy yendo r la y jardín Y el u otro medio a ey ey de la casa uyueue u otro uso o ey de fuerza eu ebriedad he rvveh b. Xnc. Nxbx xbxjieyu que en
I repeat that by symmetry argument the OP's original statement is meaningless. A pawn exchange for one side is also a pawn exchange for the other side and all the pluses and minuses for the one are also the pluses and minuses for the other - until you add conditions and circumstances which are not the same for both sides. Case closed.
Ggh
