FEN shows no en passant square. Game already terminated with last capture by black king or move of black pawn by one square..
If its's a valid problem you need to be able to prove en passant without reference to the FEN anyway.
FEN shows no en passant square. Game already terminated with last capture by black king or move of black pawn by one square..
If its's a valid problem you need to be able to prove en passant without reference to the FEN anyway.
The position is drawn - I looked it up on Syzygy when I posted #66. I was just pointing out your solution was incomplete. (Still is in fact because the queen doesn't need to bite, e,g, 2...Qh6+.)
Just copy the FEN and visit https://syzygy-tables.info/.
Qf4 Kc8 should be met with Kc5. My issue against the engine is I get a position where my king and my oponents king is on a different central file.
Like for example his king on d8 and mine on e5.
I also often get to force is back so much that if I play the queen to the philidor position my king would like one more move to play kc6 for example. But if I play Kc6 immediately then the queen isn't on the right square
yes. ur right. and Rat finally got one right for once. tho they needed a program to do it. they could never figure it out on their own. not indy enuf.
looks like a Rook+p fortress. but the bishop is a grown up pawn.
like this:
interestingly, there are many QvRP positions that can be broken down into a win for the queen... i believe 'derek grimmell' on youtube has a few videos laying out the technique.
According to Syzygy again (or Nalimov) - if White has the queen about
42% White wins in at most 70 moves (with the queen)
37% draws
21% Black wins in at most 21 moves (with rook and bishop)
All wins possible within the 50 move rule.
(As usual under FIDE competition rules the figures relate to positions with ply count 0.)
thinka en passant