13474 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
In this game, I had the black pieces. I made a mistake or 2 early that put me down a minor piece and a pawn. I ended up fighting back and getting a draw. My question here though is regarding the endgame I agreed to simplify too. I got the draw, but I have this feeling it may not have been drawn, and that it was a mistake to simplify to it. I have commented on the whole game, but move 37 is the one I'm most curious about. Feel free to comment on any part of the game. I'm always looking for feedback.
Having said that, White went wrong in the supposedly simple pawn ending, so it's hard to criticise... :)
Excellent. Thank your for the breakdown. I really need to spend a little more time on the King and multiple pawn vs pawn endings.
Yeah I don't know how I screwed that up at the end but it is driving me crazy. :)
Great analysis on the game, and move 21 for me was definitely a mistake. I thought I played a pretty good game up until the end there when I gave away the bishop for free (completely unnecessary but at the time I must have been thinking it set up the pawn advantage for me).
Anybody know where exactly I completely screwed up the pawn-king at the end there? I played it through lots of times before the race to the other side of the board started and thought there was no way I could screw it up, and yet somehow managed to do so.
Altogether it was a really fun game though against a fun opponent.
Ah, good analysis camembert, I see where I went wrong.
Amazing how out of practice one can get, I used to know the king-pawn thing well, but it just goes to show without regular play, nothing is elementary! :)
Else if Black goes backwards:
Therefore I concur that it was bad to swap off the rooks!
And if white had have played b4 one move earlier..... :D
In your diagram, a simple 4.b4 leads to an easy win. although there are many patterns, camembert is essentially correct.
edit: above refers to your 1st diagram. did not see 2nd two until posting. Your 2nd 2 diagrams are completely correct and it is indeed bad to swap the rooks.
When ahead, swap pieces not pawns
When behind, swap pawns not pieces.
2 pawns against 1 usually wins especially when the kings are about equally positioned as is the case here.
I believe white can force the swap starting with
another rule of thumb in rook and pawn engames - Rooks on keeps drawing chances, rooks off: better winning chances.
Excellent. All this analysis of our endgame is really making me realize how much room I have for improvement.
Yes this is great stuff, thanks to Remludar for posting the game and the experts for their comments!
It seems that the rook swap was good for white, should have led to a win but the endgame was fumbled and black made no mistakes getting itself in the best possible position for a draw.
But even if you hadn't traded rooks white should still win, athough it would be much more difficult.
here is how game the might have gone if you hadn't traded rooks.
2/14/2016 - Quick And Painless Mate
by breidi a few minutes ago
form a chess team
by kalolokia 9 minutes ago
What's wrong with people on chess.com?
by fightingbob 12 minutes ago
Who will win Candidates 2016
by alexm2310 18 minutes ago
New chess channel to improve your lightning/blitz,rapid games
by notmtwain 22 minutes ago
How do I get rid of my profile picture?
by GnrfFrtzl 30 minutes ago
When exactly do you play a certain opening?
by Radiovitch 33 minutes ago
Is this what Chess has become? Blitz vs. Classical
by platolag 36 minutes ago
2/13/2016 - Filipp S. Bondarenko, Feenschach 1960
by wilburhuang 43 minutes ago
Was Alekhine assassinated?
by NDsteve 51 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!