Who hate endgame study

Sort:
Chesswarrier123456

I hate end game study friends

gyregimble

The selection of endgames studies for studying not an easy task.

I prefer those positions which contain practical technique, strategies, and calculation which (however hidden) give my brain a workout leading to further understanding as opposed to studies whose solutions last far too many moves and whose computer-like nature defy any logic I can generate.

A wonderful starting book for those dipping their toes in the water is Endgame Magic, by John Beasley & Timothy Whitworth.

 

korotky_trinity
KilianFinger wrote:
Same here. Endgames study is key for getting better at chess, I would recommend that you do them too.

I agree. The Ending are very important element of the gane.

Gambitiodic

A lot of endgames are rook and pawn endgames. Just learning the Philidor position can flip many endgame losses to draws.

There are a few brief and very helpful "endgame" lessons under "lessons" on chess.com if you want to pick up some helpful tactics without having to read a whole book on a topic you don't like.

tygxc

"To improve at chess you should in the first instance study the endgame" - Capablanca

LawTonz

It seems like OP "died in Endgame". wink.png

Kooopytko

Me to

martinbchess

It’s painful but endgame study hugely increases your calculation ability and understanding of piece relationships. 

mati963741

Same

MyNameIsNotBuddy

I actually really like the endgame. It's like a completely different game from the middlegame and opening

MyNameIsNotBuddy
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
MyNameIsNotBuddy wrote:

I actually really like the endgame. It's like a completely different game from the middlegame and opening

Notice how those who like endgames are better at chess than those who don't.

Cause they bother to study and know how to calculate (at least a little bit)

MyNameIsNotBuddy
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
MyNameIsNotBuddy wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
MyNameIsNotBuddy wrote:

I actually really like the endgame. It's like a completely different game from the middlegame and opening

Notice how those who like endgames are better at chess than those who don't.

Cause they bother to study and know how to calculate (at least a little bit)

Yeah. I am pretty good at endgames myself, I just need to improve on imbalances in endgames.

I learned the endgame pretty much entirely from Chessmaster 10th edition, and I can probably play endgames largely on intuition, though they often require calculation.

Graywing13

@Nickolay, try this one happy.png

 

 

Viewtiful-Joe

My girlfriend's parents, knowing I had taken an interest in chess, purchased Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual for me as a Christmas present. I don't have the heart tell them how lost I am by the 2nd chapter. 

Hell of a first chess book. 

n9531l1
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Give me an endgame puzzle, I would probably solve it.

If you want one that includes an important lesson, try this one.

White to play and draw.

 

 

n9531l1
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Give me an endgame puzzle, I would probably solve it.

If you want one you probably won't solve on your own, try this one.

White to play and win.

 

 

n9531l1
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Puzzle is a bit wrong, just check the analysis.

Which puzzle, and wrong in what way?

n9531l1
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

b3, g3+, Ke2,

Can you tell what black should play after?

If this is your attempt to win for White, let's play it out. I'll play Black and try to draw.

1. b3 g3+ 2. Ke2 g2.  Your move. If Kf2, g1=Q+.

n9531l1

With a black queen at g1, Kg2 is illegal.

Graywing13

Did you try mine? I don't think post 25 refers to any puzzle