1400 am I still a beginner?

Sort:
RichColorado

I'm at daily 1451 presently. . .

Been playing since 1952 and I'm still a beginner . . .

On my ratings i was as high as 1749 for a short time. . .

Then dropped way down to 1362 . . . 

i think it's because of my age . . .  I'll be 85 in December . . .I

I always thought 1800 daily would be a great rating . . .

           

DrSpudnik
RichColorado wrote:

I'm at 1451 presently. . .

Been playing since 1952 and I'm still a beginner . . .

On my ratings i was as high as 1749 for a short time. . .

Then dropped way down to 1362 . . . 

i think it's because of my age . . .  I'll be 85 in December . . .I

I always thought 1800 would be a great rating . . .

           

It only seems great until you get there. Then you look upward and see 2000, 2100, 2200....

Mike_Kalish
RichColorado wrote:

I'm at 1451 presently. . .

Been playing since 1952 and I'm still a beginner . . .

.  I'll be 85 in December . . .I

 

           

I'll be 77 in January. YOU are my new hero! tournaments

RichColorado

@ mikekalish never been a hero before . . .

Nobody said that to me before . . .

77? . .

Hm you should join THE GEEZER GROUP!  You must be 50 years old to join . . .

It's one of the groups I belong to . . .

Bye for now friend . . .

You might read my profile . . .

               

 

fl00psf00glies

I'd have

fl00psf00glies

I'd have to add that different game times, computer vs person, etc all factor into whether or not your elo is beginner. It changes for all of them because in a way they're all different games