Chess is very easy to improve

Sort:
caseyfloridian

He was 750 elo(rapid) August 25th losing to 900s

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/55216817603?tab=review

His last win was Nov 5th (rapid) he was 2145! Beat a 2102 in 19 moves with 96 accuracy

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/61426289651?tab=review

I hope you guys take him as an example, with some hard work you can go from 700 to 2150+ in just a few months just do some puzzles and read a book you're welcome

 

Gotta love getting downvoted for this post cry lol

llama36

Wow, this person is so consistent, they always score about 66% no matter what kind of rating they play against.

Vs players rated 9xx, andy scores 70% for a performance rating of ~1100
Vs players rated 10xx, andy scores 86% for a performance rating of ~1350
Vs players rated 11xx, andy scores 80% for a performance rating of ~1390
Vs players rated 12xx, andy scores 76% for a performance rating of ~1450
Vs players rated 13xx, andy scores 66% for a performance rating of ~1470
Vs players rated 14xx, andy scores 70% for a performance rating of ~1600
Vs players rated 15xx, andy scores 62% for a performance rating of ~1635
Vs players rated 16xx, andy scores 70% for a performance rating of ~1800
Vs players rated 17xx, andy scores 72% for a performance rating of ~1915
Vs players rated 18xx, andy scores 66% for a performance rating of ~1965
Vs players rated 19xx, andy scores 67% for a performance rating of ~2070
Vs players rated 20xx, andy scores 62% for a performance rating of ~2135

llama36

And it's not only consistency in wins, they also consistently make all their moves after 5 seconds! Wow, they must have trained really hard. Very impressive.

caseyfloridian
llama36 wrote:

And it's not only consistency in wins, they also consistently make all their moves after 5 seconds! Wow, they must have trained really hard. Very impressive.

All you have to do is get good 

JokerBen

I think that the user AndyBrez is probably a cheater.

Chuck639
JokerBen wrote:

I think that the user AndyBrez is probably a cheater.

You’re not suppose to say the “c” word!

llama36
JokerBen wrote:

I think that the user AndyBrez is probably a cheater.

Yes, that's the point, but if you say it directly a mod will cry about it tongue.png

caseyfloridian
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble
Chuck639
caseyfloridian wrote:
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble

Casey man?

Let the CDT do their work and they have replied. You have multiples threads on this lol

KZforever

At the end, Bobby Fischer was right in his cynicism about chess. It's over. Computers killed it.

Not that it matters for the likes of us, just messing around. But there are certain realities that are just part and parcel of the pros and cons of having all this computing power.

I didn't use that other "c" word, and I don't mean the 4-letter one. But you get my drift.

neatgreatfire
Chuck639 wrote:
caseyfloridian wrote:
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble

Casey man?

Let the CDT do their work and they have replied. You have multiples threads on this lol

He makes a good point though. He made a thread almost three weeks ago on the same player, and the player is still not banned. Really? It's ridiculously easy to see that he's cheating. As well as what was said above, many of his games are lost to idiotic moves that no 2100 would ever make. Chess.com's cheating detection team really needs to get its act together. Of course, it's a diamond member.....

Chuck639
neatgreatfire wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
caseyfloridian wrote:
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble

Casey man?

Let the CDT do their work and they have replied. You have multiples threads on this lol

He makes a good point though. He made a thread almost three weeks ago on the same player, and the player is still not banned. Really? It's ridiculously easy to see that he's cheating. As well as what was said above, many of his games are lost to idiotic moves that no 2100 would ever make. Chess.com's cheating detection team really needs to get its act together. Of course, it's a diamond member.....

You guys know this is the public forum and in the wrong with public accusations?

There is actually a club for this stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

 

neatgreatfire
Chuck639 wrote:
neatgreatfire wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
caseyfloridian wrote:
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble

Casey man?

Let the CDT do their work and they have replied. You have multiples threads on this lol

He makes a good point though. He made a thread almost three weeks ago on the same player, and the player is still not banned. Really? It's ridiculously easy to see that he's cheating. As well as what was said above, many of his games are lost to idiotic moves that no 2100 would ever make. Chess.com's cheating detection team really needs to get its act together. Of course, it's a diamond member.....

You guys know this is the public forum and in the wrong with public accusations?

There is actually a club for this stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

 

I don't think it was posted in the right place, I'm just saying that the OP brings up a good point.

I do believe this should be deleted or moved though.

llama36
Chuck639 wrote:
neatgreatfire wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
caseyfloridian wrote:
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble

Casey man?

Let the CDT do their work and they have replied. You have multiples threads on this lol

He makes a good point though. He made a thread almost three weeks ago on the same player, and the player is still not banned. Really? It's ridiculously easy to see that he's cheating. As well as what was said above, many of his games are lost to idiotic moves that no 2100 would ever make. Chess.com's cheating detection team really needs to get its act together. Of course, it's a diamond member.....

You guys know this is the public forum and in the wrong with public accusations?

There is actually a club for this stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

 

I have no idea what you mean. We were saying this player is very good.

If you think this player is cheating you shouldn't mention it here, there is a club for that stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

Chuck639
llama36 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
neatgreatfire wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
caseyfloridian wrote:
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble

Casey man?

Let the CDT do their work and they have replied. You have multiples threads on this lol

He makes a good point though. He made a thread almost three weeks ago on the same player, and the player is still not banned. Really? It's ridiculously easy to see that he's cheating. As well as what was said above, many of his games are lost to idiotic moves that no 2100 would ever make. Chess.com's cheating detection team really needs to get its act together. Of course, it's a diamond member.....

You guys know this is the public forum and in the wrong with public accusations?

There is actually a club for this stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

 

I have no idea what you mean. We were saying this player is very good.

If you think this player is cheating you shouldn't mention it here, there is a club for that stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

Are you saying ban the guy because Sherlock and Holmes are on the trail?

llama36
Chuck639 wrote:
llama36 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
neatgreatfire wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
caseyfloridian wrote:
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble

Casey man?

Let the CDT do their work and they have replied. You have multiples threads on this lol

He makes a good point though. He made a thread almost three weeks ago on the same player, and the player is still not banned. Really? It's ridiculously easy to see that he's cheating. As well as what was said above, many of his games are lost to idiotic moves that no 2100 would ever make. Chess.com's cheating detection team really needs to get its act together. Of course, it's a diamond member.....

You guys know this is the public forum and in the wrong with public accusations?

There is actually a club for this stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

 

I have no idea what you mean. We were saying this player is very good.

If you think this player is cheating you shouldn't mention it here, there is a club for that stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

Are you saying ban the guy because Sherlock and Holmes are on the trail?

I don't know what that means.

1g1yy
llama36 wrote:

Wow, this person is so consistent, they always score about 66% no matter what kind of rating they play against.

Vs players rated 9xx, andy scores 70% for a performance rating of ~1100
Vs players rated 10xx, andy scores 86% for a performance rating of ~1350
Vs players rated 11xx, andy scores 80% for a performance rating of ~1390
Vs players rated 12xx, andy scores 76% for a performance rating of ~1450
Vs players rated 13xx, andy scores 66% for a performance rating of ~1470
Vs players rated 14xx, andy scores 70% for a performance rating of ~1600
Vs players rated 15xx, andy scores 62% for a performance rating of ~1635
Vs players rated 16xx, andy scores 70% for a performance rating of ~1800
Vs players rated 17xx, andy scores 72% for a performance rating of ~1915
Vs players rated 18xx, andy scores 66% for a performance rating of ~1965
Vs players rated 19xx, andy scores 67% for a performance rating of ~2070
Vs players rated 20xx, andy scores 62% for a performance rating of ~2135

It isn't right to use statistics as proof. Nothing can be derived from a small sample set of a few games. Every one of us should be honored to be in the presence of a hard-working, honest, reformed young man, who's been working so hard on their chess. It takes dedication beyond anything we could know to play at these levels. Only the most gifted of individuals could exhibit such performance as this.

Chuck639

Yeah you guys crack me up. 

Keep me posted.

caseyfloridian
Chuck639 wrote:
neatgreatfire wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
caseyfloridian wrote:
If I speak I am in big trouble big big trouble and I don’t want to be in big trouble

Casey man?

Let the CDT do their work and they have replied. You have multiples threads on this lol

He makes a good point though. He made a thread almost three weeks ago on the same player, and the player is still not banned. Really? It's ridiculously easy to see that he's cheating. As well as what was said above, many of his games are lost to idiotic moves that no 2100 would ever make. Chess.com's cheating detection team really needs to get its act together. Of course, it's a diamond member.....

You guys know this is the public forum and in the wrong with public accusations?

There is actually a club for this stuff:

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

 

Well the first line in that forum's description is

"This club is NOT a place to learn 'how to cheat' or to name and shame people you feel are/may be cheating."

I'm mostly annoyed because they're allowing a clear cheater to waste at this point hundreds of people's time playing chess. But then go on and say they have the best cheat detection software, yeah sure. Couldn't be more obvious. He's been reported twice by me and I've messaged ~ 10 or so players he's played who've responded they've reported him but still hes been playing for months now. If they found Hans cheated in 100+ games I'd bet it was more like 500+ lol

HawkedEkko

700 to 2150 in a few months??????? For whoever this person is, the world championship title is waiting.