Do people actually think about theories while playing?

Sort:
nastync
There seems to be an infinite amount of movesets and names for different openings and tons of different kinds of resources. I find it difficult to memorize such a vast amount of information, so I was wondering how much do people actually use the already existing theories while playing? My style so far has been to just observe the ongoing game and adjust accordingly. It works like half the time, but I can't seem to improve. Studying seems so overwhelming, so is memorizing movesets really the only way to improve?
busterlark
I mean, when we’re in an opening that I recognize, and then my opponent plays a move that I don’t recognize, that’s when I stop to think, “why don’t I usually see this move? Is this actually a good move, or is there a reason why I don’t usually see this? Why are the moves that I made leading up to this considered OK moves?”

I don’t think about theory as, “my opponent slipped up, here is the proper punishment” per se. I think of, “this is a move I don’t usually see. How suspicious is it?”

Also, it gets easier to memorize lines once you understand the ideas behind the lines. So it’s not so much memorizing specific moves for me, as it is memorizing the ideas that I should look for in specific positions.
blank0923

Frankly speaking, the better you are at the game, the more you will be able to memorize since the moves will make sense as they contribute to some objective (it's like literally any subject in the world). 

 

Morfizera

Do not worry about memorizing anything - whether it's moves or names of openings. When it comes to openings, instead of memorizing you should learn and understand the Opening Principles https://www.chess.com/lessons/opening-principles

 

Eventually you'll start memorizing the moves almost by osmosis because they'll came naturally and you'll understand what the moves are trying to accomplish.

With time, just from seeing the names of the openings you'll recognize "oh this is the italian game, this is the sicilian defense, etc etc"

But do not worry about "opening theory" and memorizing the moves because even if you do memorize the moves, chances are your opponent won't know the theory and will play something different and you won't know what to do, which is why is important to learn and understand the previously mentioned opening principles

Good Luck

Chuck639
nastync wrote:
There seems to be an infinite amount of movesets and names for different openings and tons of different kinds of resources. I find it difficult to memorize such a vast amount of information, so I was wondering how much do people actually use the already existing theories while playing? My style so far has been to just observe the ongoing game and adjust accordingly. It works like half the time, but I can't seem to improve. Studying seems so overwhelming, so is memorizing movesets really the only way to improve?

I play a hypermodern game and rely on ideas not theory nor opening principles:

https://www.chess.com/game/live/44598551583

https://www.chess.com/game/live/40451975359

https://www.chess.com/game/live/24620535969

I can assure you I read no books and just winged it! Have fun and free roll it.

I just couldn’t grasp the 1.e4 and 1.d4 stuff from (both sides ) so I bypassed the heavy theory and popular opinions.

Working out well ever since!