Does this look suspicious?

Sort:
MrBlunderer76
[Site "Chess.com iPhone"]
[Date "06/05/2022 01:53AM"]
[FEN rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1]
[White "MrBlunderer76"]
[Black "Buzzwolee"
[Variant "chess"]
[Result "Buzzwolee won by checkmate"]
[WhiteElo "1078"]
[BlackElo "1161"]
[Termination "Buzzwolee won by checkmate"]

1.d4 {15:08} f5 {15:07} 2.Nf3 {15:07} Nf6 {15:03} 3.Bf4 {15:14} d6 {15:08} 4.e3 {15:20} Nc6 {15:05} 5.Bd3 {15:19} g6 {15:10} 6.c3 {14:57} Bg7 {15:12} 7.Nbd2 {15:04} e5 {15:10} 8.dxe5 {15:00} dxe5 {15:11} 9.Nxe5 {13:48} Nxe5 {15:14} 10.Bb5+ {13:54} c6 {15:17} 11.Bxe5 {13:58} cxb5 {15:22} 12.O-O {13:33} Be6 {15:19} 13.Qe2 {13:30} O-O {15:23} 14.Nf3 {13:11} Bc4 {12:02} 15.Qd2 {12:11} Qxd2 {10:38} 16.Nxd2 {12:15} Bxf1 {10:48} 17.Rxf1 {12:22} Rfe8 {10:37} 18.Bd4 {12:18} Rad8 {9:30} 19.Nf3 {12:17} Nd5 {9:18} 20.Bxa7 {12:12} b6 {9:08} 21.Nd4 {12:04} Bxd4 {9:01} 22.cxd4 {11:56} Ra8 {8:23} 23.Bxb6 {11:22} Nxb6 {8:24} 24.a3 {11:28} Nc4 {8:19} 25.h3 {11:31} Nxb2 {8:25} 26.Rb1 {11:34} Nd3 {8:21} 27.Rb3 {11:34} b4 {8:03} 28.axb4 {11:11} Ra1+ {8:08} 29.Kh2 {11:17} Nxf2 {8:18} 30.b5 {11:20} Rh1+ {8:15} 31.Kg3 {11:24} Ne4+ {8:22} 32.Kh4 {9:41} g5+ {6:37} 33.Kh5 {9:06} Rg1 {6:47} 34.b6 {9:01} Kg7 {6:54} 35.b7 {8:38} Re6 {6:55} 36.b8=Q {4:25} Rh6# {7:02} {Buzzwolee won by checkmate}
MrBlunderer76
Not sure how to post the actual game on an iPhone (hah!) but grateful for any thoughts. Maybe they are just much better than me, not difficult I know!
XOsportyspiceXO

Copy and past the pgn

Jalex13
Quite suspicious! Cheater!

Didn’t see the game, you may want to switch to a pc, or a kind member of the community will post the game for you.
binomine

 

Jalex13
A kind man has entered! Thank you, good sir, binomine
Jalex13
I don’t see anything “sus” as the kids would say
Whiggi

looks like an engine was used for the opening (pattern of timing/moves)
then after the game was unbalanced enough play was normal.

However in saying that sometimes people just have a great game.

If you are concerned hit that report button and see chess.com work its magic.

MrBlunderer76
Thanks guys
PeterPolicy

My guess is that account "Buzzwolee" is cheating. It took that person a full 3 minutes and 30 seconds to pin your queen to your rook on move 14.

I clicked on Buzz's account and that person has a 87 percent accuracy against a player rated 900 points above him (June 2 against el_rashio  (2085).

I'm surprised that guy wasn't banned before you played him the next day.

Eseles

Such threads should be reserved for the Cheating Forum, and even there it's not allowed to publicly name someone as a possible cheater (you should post the game without the name of your opponent).

https://www.chess.com/club/cheating-forum

GMegasDoux

You played a London against a Lenningrad Dutch and hung your Light square Bishop just out of the opening following a premature pawnbreak from Black who should have been castled first but it worked out for them. With Black now up a piece they went straight to simplification. Looks like something a 1100-1200 can do. Sort of thing I would do and my opponents have done to me. Once the Bishop was gone you weren't in the game.

idilis
MrBlunderer76 wrote:
Not sure how to post the actual game on an iPhone (hah!) but grateful for any thoughts. Maybe they are just much better than me, not difficult I know!

Very suspicious. 2 years here and doesn't know

1. How to post games

2. Naming and shaming is against TOS

3. Discussing cheating is against TOS. Just report.

Very very suspicious.

Grunts2018

Engines don't tend to play the dutch defense...it's not an opening suited to an engines style

This forum topic has been locked