Just wanted to pop in and say, I actually don't really care that my playing level is "officially" 1500, because this was just playing against all those computer programs. You can consider it level 1500 in the computer chess game. I was just surprised suddenly I couldn't even beat level 800. There is no competitive intention here and I did not intend to portray myself as competing with anyone here or anything so there's no need to "accuse" me of not having a valid Elo rating. (I didn't write that with animosity, just wanted to write to clarify there are two or three concepts being mixed up in this discussion.)
Regarding Divinity, yes I got that, I think there were two, and I got both, but after a while I lost interest (I think one of the annoying things was the audio background was too repetitive, they have the same townsfolk saying the same things over and over ad nauseum as I recall) and Wasteland 2 I have not yet tried. Will take a look thanks.
1. It is odd that you have so drastically been playing worse out of the blue. But there could be some plausible explanations.
Playing against a computer is not an accurate measure of skill in chess playing. Up till 1300 or 1400 ratings, the computer will commonly blunder pieces like knights or bishops, not as many queens. When you play against higher rated computer bots, 2000 rated, for example, they do not hang pieces but are already too strong to beat if you are at a lower level. So if you are 1500, finding a good computer bot to beat is difficult. Now on to the 1500 computer wins to 800 rated computer losses. Chess.com may have changed the bots one way or another which could explain the change but that is unlikely. You may have overestimated your abilities, plus different websites have different methods of playing. Other chess websites may use different engines for lower rating computers. Also, ratings can oddly change between websites, even against other people. My blitz rating is 1500 on one website and 1000 -1100 on the other.