Nope... I can't understand Bishop g3 move. (
I think he's simply saying it's better not to trade your dark squared bishop for the opponent's King's knight.
Oh... It's more high level of understanding of Chess game than mine. (
The move number 39 is the same story.
It's not an inaccuracy as you think.
It is silly blunder too which costed you the losed game.
It would be enough 39.... Rook c5... and you could have chances for a draw.
Look, he’s 1100 for a reason. If he won’t accept that everyone blunders, he will never get better.
The 36th move. Why did you not take his helpless undefended pawn g2 with your Rook !?
This is what I told about... It's obvious that it was your fatal blunder.
- If that's a blunder, why does chess.com not say it's a blunder.
- Where are the blunders of this 1150 in this game, which you claim always happen?
- If all "not blundering" would get you is a draw against 1150, how would one climb to 1600 by "not blundering" as you claim? Your claim remains utterly preposterous.
The 36th move. Why did you not take his helpless undefended pawn g2 with your Rook !?
This is what I told about... It's obvious that it was your fatal blunder.
- If that's a blunder, why does chess.com not say it's a blunder.
- If all "not blundering" would get you is a draw against 1150, how would one climb to 1600 by "not blundering" as you claim? Your claim remains utterly preposterous.
I see you don’t get it. In the specific game, you could have played better, and if you didn’t blunder then, you would win.
Korotky already said I'd only get a draw in this game even if I didn't "blunder." Can't climb to 1600 getting draws against 1150s.
NO. You made some inaccuracies and blunders before hand to get you in a bad position. That is how chess works.
NO. You made some inaccuracies and blunders before hand to get you in a bad position. That is how chess works.
Yes.
AuntheKnight is right.
Sometimes it is enough to make one inaccurate step in the game... and all your position... all pawns structure... tumbled down.
That way it works. )
Have a look, please, on this game.
The White move number 13. Queen c4 decided everything in this game.
I am not sure that this my current rating 1600 is my real rating... Because I keep blundering almost every game.
This is what my thread is about.
How can one study strategies, openings, endings and all other high level Chess stuff if there are so many simple mistakes in his (her) playing?
https://youtu.be/cjsgTJrf-jA
Nope... I can't understand Bishop g3 move. (
I think he's simply saying it's better not to trade your dark squared bishop for the opponent's King's knight.