If you had just 5 min a day to improve, what would you do? - Chess Forums - Page 2

An_asparagusic_acid

Apr 29, 2020

0

#21

NMinSixMonths wrote:

An_asparagusic_acid wrote:

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

Typewriter44 wrote:

@PurtinGravy, you got to 1300 rapid by playing people below 1000

3.5 months to 1000 strength is not hard

Most people start at 1000 strength. If you think you can beat a 1700 USCF, go ahead, try it. Unless you use an engine, you won't

I have seen grandmaster games and have compared myself to them. I estimate I am between 2500 - 2700 chess.com rating strength.

I can dunk on my 7 foot basketball goal, am I the next Lebron?

How old are you BTW if you're like six and 1300 then props that's really impressive, if you're out of school already no offense but 2200 is gonna be near impossible

btw I don't want it to look like I'm hating I'm just annoyed, I have no problem with you though

I got to 2000 without studying.

Except your rating is artificial. You have trouble against 1000-1200 rated players in bullet and you don't even play blitz against anything but bots. Why not just play real people and drop to your true rating instead of trying to get popularity points on a website where you're anonymous?

My other account was @Icravethatmineral

Typewriter44

Apr 29, 2020

0

#22

An_asparagusic_acid wrote:

NMinSixMonths wrote:

An_asparagusic_acid wrote:

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

Typewriter44 wrote:

@PurtinGravy, you got to 1300 rapid by playing people below 1000

3.5 months to 1000 strength is not hard

Most people start at 1000 strength. If you think you can beat a 1700 USCF, go ahead, try it. Unless you use an engine, you won't

I have seen grandmaster games and have compared myself to them. I estimate I am between 2500 - 2700 chess.com rating strength.

I can dunk on my 7 foot basketball goal, am I the next Lebron?

How old are you BTW if you're like six and 1300 then props that's really impressive, if you're out of school already no offense but 2200 is gonna be near impossible

btw I don't want it to look like I'm hating I'm just annoyed, I have no problem with you though

I got to 2000 without studying.

Except your rating is artificial. You have trouble against 1000-1200 rated players in bullet and you don't even play blitz against anything but bots. Why not just play real people and drop to your true rating instead of trying to get popularity points on a website where you're anonymous?

My other account was @Icravethatmineral

Wow, 8 games! That must give you 100% rating accuracy!

Typewriter44

Apr 29, 2020

0

#23

PurtinGravy wrote:

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

NMinSixMonths wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

NMinSixMonths wrote:

Who wants to bet on the over/under for how many hours it takes this nutjob to get banned? I'll give him 24 hours.

I'll give you 1000 to 1 odds that i'm not banned this year, paid via paypal

I'm not betting some idiot on the internet who has no money. You're amusing for now but soon you'll be gone and if you don't get banned your shtick will get boring. Nobody cares about you and nobody ever will so soak up all the attention while you can get it.

I make 7 figures.

Alpha male

Nobody cares, chief

I'm a lady and I am beginning to think that I am a bit older than you so whatever...

Well, you still seem to want to be an alpha male, regardless.

Typewriter44

Apr 29, 2020

0

#24

PurtinGravy wrote:

Typewriter44 wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

NMinSixMonths wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

NMinSixMonths wrote:

Who wants to bet on the over/under for how many hours it takes this nutjob to get banned? I'll give him 24 hours.

I'll give you 1000 to 1 odds that i'm not banned this year, paid via paypal

I'm not betting some idiot on the internet who has no money. You're amusing for now but soon you'll be gone and if you don't get banned your shtick will get boring. Nobody cares about you and nobody ever will so soak up all the attention while you can get it.

I make 7 figures.

Alpha male

Nobody cares, chief

I'm a lady and I am beginning to think that I am a bit older than you so whatever...

Well, you still seem to want to be an alpha male, regardless.

Sorry but all these buzz words are just too much for me. Go back to tumblr.

Big words. Maybe you should go back to your mommy and get her to talk to me

An_asparagusic_acid

Apr 29, 2020

0

#25

NMinSixMonths wrote:

An_asparagusic_acid wrote:

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

Typewriter44 wrote:

@PurtinGravy, you got to 1300 rapid by playing people below 1000

3.5 months to 1000 strength is not hard

Most people start at 1000 strength. If you think you can beat a 1700 USCF, go ahead, try it. Unless you use an engine, you won't

I have seen grandmaster games and have compared myself to them. I estimate I am between 2500 - 2700 chess.com rating strength.

I can dunk on my 7 foot basketball goal, am I the next Lebron?

How old are you BTW if you're like six and 1300 then props that's really impressive, if you're out of school already no offense but 2200 is gonna be near impossible

btw I don't want it to look like I'm hating I'm just annoyed, I have no problem with you though

I got to 2000 without studying.

Except your rating is artificial. You have trouble against 1000-1200 rated players in bullet and you don't even play blitz against anything but bots. Why not just play real people and drop to your true rating instead of trying to get popularity points on a website where you're anonymous?

Out of my last 15 bullet games I scored 14.5/15.

An_asparagusic_acid

Apr 29, 2020

0

#26

Typewriter44 wrote:

An_asparagusic_acid wrote:

NMinSixMonths wrote:

An_asparagusic_acid wrote:

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

Typewriter44 wrote:

@PurtinGravy, you got to 1300 rapid by playing people below 1000

3.5 months to 1000 strength is not hard

Most people start at 1000 strength. If you think you can beat a 1700 USCF, go ahead, try it. Unless you use an engine, you won't

I have seen grandmaster games and have compared myself to them. I estimate I am between 2500 - 2700 chess.com rating strength.

I can dunk on my 7 foot basketball goal, am I the next Lebron?

How old are you BTW if you're like six and 1300 then props that's really impressive, if you're out of school already no offense but 2200 is gonna be near impossible

btw I don't want it to look like I'm hating I'm just annoyed, I have no problem with you though

I got to 2000 without studying.

Except your rating is artificial. You have trouble against 1000-1200 rated players in bullet and you don't even play blitz against anything but bots. Why not just play real people and drop to your true rating instead of trying to get popularity points on a website where you're anonymous?

My other account was @Icravethatmineral

Wow, 8 games! That must give you 100% rating accuracy!

On my old account @asparagusic_acids I was >1900 before I went on tilt.

SoupTime4

Apr 29, 2020

0

#27

lol...I see we have the latest incarnation of "I made <insert title here> without studying"

Reported and moving on...

An_asparagusic_acid

Apr 29, 2020

0

#28

NMinSixMonths wrote:

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

guys, @an_asparagusic_acid isn't the enemy here, keep your eye on the prize

Neither of them is the enemy. They're just both creatures only fit to be showered with pity.

I could destroy you in blitz.

An_asparagusic_acid

Apr 29, 2020

0

#29

I will challenge you right now.

An_asparagusic_acid

Apr 29, 2020

0

#30

NMinSixMonths wrote:

An_asparagusic_acid wrote:

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

PurtinGravy wrote:

Typewriter44 wrote:

@PurtinGravy, you got to 1300 rapid by playing people below 1000

3.5 months to 1000 strength is not hard

Most people start at 1000 strength. If you think you can beat a 1700 USCF, go ahead, try it. Unless you use an engine, you won't

I have seen grandmaster games and have compared myself to them. I estimate I am between 2500 - 2700 chess.com rating strength.

I can dunk on my 7 foot basketball goal, am I the next Lebron?

How old are you BTW if you're like six and 1300 then props that's really impressive, if you're out of school already no offense but 2200 is gonna be near impossible

btw I don't want it to look like I'm hating I'm just annoyed, I have no problem with you though

I got to 2000 without studying.

Except your rating is artificial. You have trouble against 1000-1200 rated players in bullet and you don't even play blitz against anything but bots. Why not just play real people and drop to your true rating instead of trying to get popularity points on a website where you're anonymous?

Here is a game where I flagged in a winning position.

Spiritbro77

Apr 29, 2020

0

#31

Tactics on here. Puzzle Rush or one of the other varieties.

BlindThief

Apr 29, 2020

0

#32

RussellWestbr00k wrote:

Oh so now we're talking sh*t, I can adopt you right now if I wanted to

I never heard “adopt” used in such a fashion, but I like it.

BlindThief

Apr 29, 2020

0

#33

Yo, I’m with the child chess prodigy that expands my vocabulary.

tl;dr- I’m not your friend, buddy

Typewriter44

Apr 30, 2020

0

#34

Typewriter44 wrote:

NMinSixMonths wrote:

Who wants to bet on the over/under for how many hours it takes this nutjob to get banned? I'll give him 24 hours.

Nah, it's only 3:41pm in Pacific Time. That means support is probably covering reports right now. I don't bet, but with 3 reports, and 3 reasons to close (engine cheating AND trolling AND being a banned account coming back), He'll be banned before Sunset (well, the sun is already setting here, but I'd make the over/under 6 hours)

Well, I was wrong. @Purtingravy banned 14 hours later.

jacagold

Apr 30, 2020

0

#35

i would do exercises

SocialistEgypt

Apr 30, 2020

0

#36

I would quit chess.

Muisuitglijder

Apr 30, 2020

0

#37

SocialistEgypt schreef:

I would quit chess.

That is what i was thinking on second thought. I think that is the best reply to this post. I would atleast quit trying to improve and just play for fun.

MoonTheAlpha

Apr 30, 2020

0

#38

I don't Know.

MoonTheAlpha

Apr 30, 2020

0

#39

MoonTheAlpha wrote:

I don't Know.

SocialistEgypt

Apr 30, 2020

0

#40

@RussellWestbr00k
@Spelenderwijs
That's the only realistic solution