Mediocrity, and Why It's Fun!

Sort:
bagelrabbit
     Don't get me wrong, I want to get better at chess. It's very satisfying to beat stronger and stronger opponents, rising up the ranks and claiming my rightful place as a Very Good Chess Person. But there are some perks to my mediocrity.
 
     A little background, since I'm new here: I've been playing pretty regularly for about a month and a half after a hiatus of over 10 years, and wow, does it show. I made a lot of dumb mistakes. I'm still making a lot of dumb mistakes. But every time I manage anything even a little impressive, it feels magical.
 

 

      This is a game I played today. I won, despite being down a rook and two minor pieces. This isn't me trying to brag, or claiming I played well. Obviously I didn't. But I squeaked my way to a narrow victory and had a lot of fun in the process. And thus we come to the title of this post.

     I like games that have surprising outcomes, games that feel fresh and new. It's fun to make the most out of unusual positions. Being mediocre and playing mediocre people gives you a "safety net" to take chances. I like testing this net. It's fun, even when things inevitably go awry!

     In conclusion, I strongly encourage everyone to be a little worse at chess, because (1) it makes me look better, and (2) it's fun. Thank you.

baddogno

Embrace mediocrity you say?  Some us still strive to attain it...wink.png

baddogno

Actually that did look like a fun game.  When blunders build up it introduces wild imbalances.  Chess at higher levels seems more about order than chaos.  I'm suddenly having a wild urge to go lose a few games of blitz...Mediocrity, we're on it!

bagelrabbit
baddogno wrote:

Actually that did look like a fun game.  When blunders build up it introduces wild imbalances.  Chess at higher levels seems more about order than chaos.  I'm suddenly having a wild urge to go lose a few games of blitz...Mediocrity, we're on it!

That's the spirit!