Openings against d4 for 1400 rapid player

Sort:
ChampoftheBepoCamp

What are some openings I can use against d4 as an 1400+ rated rapid player... Note I am not trying to learn everything atm just a opening or 2 to solidly play against the Queen's pawn

I have been playing the englund gambit against d4 for a while... I was looking for some more solid options.

KeSetoKaiba

I depends on your playstyle and what openings you may be open to experimenting with. Here are some solid options versus 1. d4

-1...d5 Symmetry yes, but this is clearly fine. Many avoid this because they don't want to face against the Queen's Gambit. If this is the case for you, then perhaps looking into a 1...Nf6 opening is the route you'll prefer. Otherwise, 1...d5 is okay. Simple, yes. Of course some lines can be complicated if you are into that playstyle. 1...d5 opening more complicated might be the sharp Slav Defense (1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6) or you might try the more tame (but also solid) Queen's Gambit Declined (1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6). 

If you want to accept the Queen's Gambit, then you by all means can as long as you aren't too greedy with keeping the "extra" pawn. Black's best lines in the Queen's Gambit Accepted involve giving back the pawn at the right time to catch up in development. If you keep the pawn for dear life, then you'll likely either fall into a White trap, or give White an initiative or similar compensation for the pawn such as the center.

I comment all this about the Queen's Gambit because it is the "main" opening to consider when countering 1. d4 I think. Of course, White may play 1. d4 and not play the Queen's Gambit (Catalan, Trompowsky, English Opening by transposition etc.), but we are here to discuss primarily Black's options, not openings for White. grin.png

-1...Nf6 has many good openings as well. I recommend looking into the exciting Nimzo-Indian Defense (1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4). I like sharp or dynamic play, but I realize this isn't for everyone. 

King's Indian Defense (1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O) is a popular opening as well with plenty of theory, but Black has to be okay with pawn storms to play this opening. Black typically plays for ...f5 at some point and might even begin advancing the Kingside pawns in front of the King; dangerous? Yes, sometimes it is. It can be even trickier if White's pawn storm on the Kingside comes in too! Then both Kings are a bit more in the open than other options, but it is a solid enough opening to play up through grandmaster.

Dutch Defense (1. d4 f5) is an interesting option if you want to catch 1. d4 players less prepared since this opening is less common and perhaps your opponent doesn't know the main ideas but you do grin.png This is the recommendation from IM Levy Rozman (@GothamChess) for players 1800+ in rating. (For lower ratings I think they recommended the King's Indian Defense, but I don't recall for sure - many openings are good if you are willing to learn the key ideas and experiment a bit). 

Grunfeld Defense is also really good if you like the endgame and sharp middlegames with a lot of theory. This is another advanced opening, but the hypermodern idea is to allow White to take the center (risky, but might pay off) and then play around striking the center. White will try to prove the center is a strong mass and try to hang on. Meanwhile, Black will try to claim the center is more of a target than an asset and Black will try to keep the initiative and play against the center with many thematic ways to try and undermine it. If Black is successful in getting the White center to collapse, then Black will often win. The Grunfeld Opening is: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5.

It is just a matter of seeing what middlegames you like and are comfortable with happy.png

nklristic

 If you don't mind, you can play 1.d5 and go for either Slav or QGD (or even QGA if you feel like it, but QGD is a standard response and more usual of the 2). If the opponent plays London System against you, learn when to play c5 (usually against the London when they play Bf4, c5 is a good idea) to kind of free up your position and have an ok game.

Of course you can learn some 1. ...Nf3 defense as well if that is what you like. There is no 1 right answer there. happy.png

daxypoo
keseto brings up good openings for black

i will add just a tidbit that has been working for me the last year

i limited my opening theory to maybe one or two; maybe three moves tops for all white white and black games

i try to fight for the center, develop quickly, and play

our ratings are ballpark so you know that 95% of our games are out of book in first 5 moves

as an example- i face an open sicilian maybe 1 in 20 1.e4 ...c5 games

in fact- i dont really worry about opening names anymore- just the first couple moves

try 1.d4 ...f5 or 1. d4 ...Nf6 and just play

you will get familiar “with structures” but not these grandiose ruy lopez closed 25 move theory structures...

just the first move structures

how does game develop after 1.d4 ...Nf6

well- play it 100 times and you’ll see

dont worry about screwups- just go over games to see where you need to make some adjustments

feel free and liberated and dont get bogged down by lots of opening stuff when we are out of book so soon anyway

fwiw i play

white- 1.d4 and almost always 2.c4

black- 1.e4 ...c5
1.d4 ...d5 (play ...c6 if 2.c4)- but i must admit i am thinking of changing this possibly (dont often face queens gambit and my “slav” is always rusty when i do)

good luck and let us know what you try and results you get
ChampoftheBepoCamp

Ok thanks for some help folks... yes I won't be really memorizing a ton just a few moves and later I will branch out with the analysis board more.

EKAFC

I personally play the Semi-Slav and the English Defense against d4. I've created a study for the Botvinnik Variation of the Semi-Slav here although it is one of the more complicated openings to play but still good. I like 1...b6 as it can really throw off your opponent as they don't see it very often. Struggling to find a good book on it

ChampoftheBepoCamp

@EKAFC oh you made a study... I also made a account of lichess.org but only played one blitz game on it. I was looking for a Online notebook (for chess) but I can also the lichess study to make some for myself and string it with googles docs... happy.png

DasBurner

Budapest gambit employs some similar ideas to the Englund gambit without conceding a worse position on move 1

 

DasBurner

@TheNameofNames I used to have the same attitude about Fianchetti as you do when I played 1. e4, but since I've started playing 1. d4 I've realized how they're not only super versatile (Playing a Fianchetto is almost never a bad move), but they also create so much pressure on the side of the board that they aim at. Since that realization, I've tuned my entire repertoire to be revolved around Fianchetti (i.e Rubinstein/Zukertort Colle, Catalan, Benoni-esque systems etc).

Of course, if your opponent tries to blunt your Fianchetto then you have to know how to use various pawn breaks to activate your bishop again, but it's not really a chore to do as it helps you identify potential pawn breaks better anyway

(sorry if this is incoherent, I'm writing this at like 1 am lol)

tygxc

Queen's Gambit Accepted is both solid and aggressive. Queen's Gambit Declined and Slav Defence are solid.

DerekDHarvey

 

KeSetoKaiba

Yes, they really did say that @NameofNames; I'm not particularly favoring to fianchetto structures either, but if I play the Dutch with the Black pieces (very rare if I did and probably unrated, casual game xD), then I'd probably play the Leningrad-Dutch with ...g6 and ...Bg7 grin.png

I'll see if I can find a video where Rozman talks about his opening recommendations:

First one is serious video and second one is a silly video for a little light-heartedness grin.png