Stockfish says I blundered twice by sacrificing my rook and knight for a queen?

Sort:
ChessSpeaksForItselfGG

The review said these moves were blunders.  Please disregard the initial moves, it's A short game where the last few moves is a sacrifice.

Is this really a blunder??

https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/game-gifs/90px/green/neo/0/cc/0/0/bUMwS25EWlJndjZTYnM3WkRMNVFMU1pTanIhVGZBU0VoZ1RDQTE4MXZLUktkRQ,,.gif



Sabolaa

Because he could take your queen and then he would take your knight for free and also I think you traded a bishop for a pawn

Sabolaa

My bad, it was because he could take your knight with his knight and then he has an defender for the queen

ChessSpeaksForItselfGG
Sabolaa wrote:

My bad, it was because he could take your knight with his knight and then he has an defender for the queen

Oh I feel dumb now.. Never try to outsmart the fish...