Hannah hope you get ur rating back again
I am just a forum guy who post every single forum that is posted.
It is luck that I bumped into u who post on this too.
Your rapid rating is lower than mine and I don’t care about your bullet rating.
Anyone can go check and your rating is lower.
And my name is not Hannah, so at least try to get that in your head.
Also, are you really not able to learn how to use the quote button correctly, so you don’t write your comments into the quote?
I don’t care what you hope. Rating climb is not always linear but I will climb some day, when I have improved enough.
1400 hundred using the rating excuse
What excuse? I am not making any excuses here. And I was only talking about ratings after the dude brought it into the conversation.
you should get to at least 1700 before you can say that you are better than someone
That makes no sense. 1300 is going to be way better than 800 and 800 better than 400...
no, you all play the same
No, they do not.
I was 400 when I started and I know pretty damn well that there is a huge difference between 400 and 1300.
You can deduce this from the percentiles and rating distribution graphs even if you bother to use half a brain.
you all hang pieces and make so many holes in your position it's like Milan's field
According to the ”insights” I hung exactly 1 piece and 1 pawn in my last 11 games. Those were all the games I played these last 7 days.
Believe it or not, but that’s the way it is.
I just checked ur games because I'm pretty sure insights is on crack, but not only did you trap your own rook in one game, you then proceeded to make his rook godly. And yes, there were so many holes in your positions it was too much for me, and I don't want to see the remaining 6 losses.
Do you know how to calculate?
My last game was draw, then there are 4 losses and then 2 wins.
Somehow you check one game and come to the conclusion, there are 6 remaining losses.
Pay some attention in your next math class, boy.
1+4+2 does not equal 11. When you consider that red = 'loss', grey = 'draw and green = 'win' (as per experimental tests where the results of a 'chess' game relate to the color based off 580 blitz games.
Considering this, and the terminology used in your post, we can conclude that the best way to find reds is to count 11 down from your game, and then use basic kindergarten counting skills to find that the amount of losses in this dataset is 7. Precisely, you have 2 wins, 1 draw, and 9 losses.
This experimental test has concluded, where you have had 8 losses in your last 11 games.
OK. So you were referring to the 11 games in the last 7 days. I thought you were just looking at my last played games in chronological order. My bad in this case.
How about the amount of pieces you hang though? Any comment on that?
I also try to create art when I'm not trying, so I'm just going to hang 20 zillion pieces in order to go h4-h5, and then I anyway win because 1700s suck. Maybe check my rapid games, even if you wish for more accuracy go to lichess d4isnotcrazy and try to ignore blitz because same situation except worse.
I absolutely will NOT do that.
Because you are afraid of the truth.
Also I counted, there are 8 losses, 2 draws and 1 win in 12 games, so you lost 9 times bro.
No I am not afraid of your chess stats. I just do not care enough to do that.
Hannah hope you get ur rating back again
I am just a forum guy who post every single forum that is posted.
It is luck that I bumped into u who post on this too.
Your rapid rating is lower than mine and I don’t care about your bullet rating.
Anyone can go check and your rating is lower.
And my name is not Hannah, so at least try to get that in your head.
Also, are you really not able to learn how to use the quote button correctly, so you don’t write your comments into the quote?
I don’t care what you hope. Rating climb is not always linear but I will climb some day, when I have improved enough.
1400 hundred using the rating excuse
What excuse? I am not making any excuses here. And I was only talking about ratings after the dude brought it into the conversation.
you should get to at least 1700 before you can say that you are better than someone
That makes no sense. 1300 is going to be way better than 800 and 800 better than 400...
no, you all play the same
No, they do not.
I was 400 when I started and I know pretty damn well that there is a huge difference between 400 and 1300.
You can deduce this from the percentiles and rating distribution graphs even if you bother to use half a brain.
you all hang pieces and make so many holes in your position it's like Milan's field
According to the ”insights” I hung exactly 1 piece and 1 pawn in my last 11 games. Those were all the games I played these last 7 days.
Believe it or not, but that’s the way it is.
I just checked ur games because I'm pretty sure insights is on crack, but not only did you trap your own rook in one game, you then proceeded to make his rook godly. And yes, there were so many holes in your positions it was too much for me, and I don't want to see the remaining 6 losses.
Do you know how to calculate?
My last game was draw, then there are 4 losses and then 2 wins.
Somehow you check one game and come to the conclusion, there are 6 remaining losses.
Pay some attention in your next math class, boy.
1+4+2 does not equal 11. When you consider that red = 'loss', grey = 'draw and green = 'win' (as per experimental tests where the results of a 'chess' game relate to the color based off 580 blitz games.
Considering this, and the terminology used in your post, we can conclude that the best way to find reds is to count 11 down from your game, and then use basic kindergarten counting skills to find that the amount of losses in this dataset is 7. Precisely, you have 2 wins, 1 draw, and 9 losses.
This experimental test has concluded, where you have had 8 losses in your last 11 games.
OK. So you were referring to the 11 games in the last 7 days. I thought you were just looking at my last played games in chronological order. My bad in this case.
How about the amount of pieces you hang though? Any comment on that?
I also try to create art when I'm not trying, so I'm just going to hang 20 zillion pieces in order to go h4-h5, and then I anyway win because 1700s suck. Maybe check my rapid games, even if you wish for more accuracy go to lichess d4isnotcrazy and try to ignore blitz because same situation except worse.
I absolutely will NOT do that.
Because you are afraid of the truth.
Also I counted, there are 8 losses, 2 draws and 1 win in 12 games, so you lost 9 times bro.
In my last 12 games, there are 4 wins, 1 draw and 7 losses.
Can you really not count? 8 + 2 + 1 = 11. But, there are no 8 losses in the last 11 games. There are only 7. Also in the last 12 games there are only 7 losses.
Go take the kindergarten math again, kid.