I'm also new, about a month into playing, though I did at least learn enough Chess as a kid to know how the pieces move.
If you're trying to gauge if you're improving I wouldn't necessarily rely purely on your rating.
I've actually taken to judging my strength by playing against the bots of different strength. I don't think those are accurate in terms of what your rating should be either, as I beat the 1100-1300 bots handily despite fluctuating between 400-600 in rapid, but at least I can measure progress by when I'm able to beat a bot regularly that I couldn't beat at all previously.
Hi Brock,
I guess I meant once someone understood the rules and maybe had a weeks worth of practice. Of course, even from there - some people take to something well (like any hobby) and some people need to work at it a bit more.
In my experience, I had played off-line for about a month before I created a chess.com account, so that might explain why I landed around the 600 mark straight away.
Make sure you're analysing your games too and solving tactics so you have new knowledge to gain.