@horribletomato might have the worst on chess.com 0.o but that’s just because he has a ton of points from like KOTL
Comparing view-to-point ratio. With leaderboard.
Sort:
Mar 2, 2021
0
#43
NobleElevator wrote:
@horribletomato might have the worst on chess.com 0.o but that’s just because he has a ton of points from like KOTL
No. Someone who writes something but no one sees their profile would have the least.
JackRoach wrote:
NobleElevator wrote:
@horribletomato might have the worst on chess.com 0.o but that’s just because he has a ton of points from like KOTL
No. Someone who writes something but no one sees their profile would have the least.
Well of course but out of the people who are actually known xD
@AustinL0926 holy crap, nice
omg your win rate is insane
10772:21565 or whatever
Mar 3, 2021
0
#55
Of course, this leaderboard assumes that all posts are equally valuable... that crapposting is just as valuable as helpful and informative posts.
Mar 3, 2021
0
#56
blueemu wrote:
Of course, this leaderboard assumes that all posts are equally valuable... that crapposting is just as valuable as helpful and informative posts.
Yeah. But "crapposting" hurts your view-to-point ratio usually, so it's all good.
Mar 3, 2021
0
#58
no, ratio doesnt mean anything
views slope down and go less
and etc
also it really depends
4360/1213=3,5944