critics

6. Qf3 hangs your knight.

That's also the least subtle attack ever

Mental.

TAL HAS COME TO LIFE AGAIN

Your games are full of blunders as someone at your level would expect, BUT...

There is one thing I see that makes me think that you have the potential to become much better.  You don't tend to exchange pieces just for the sake of exchanging pieces.  A lot of low rated players will trade every time there is a chance to.  Strong players don't do that as they are trying to maintain tension.

Stop bringing your queen out early or you'll never progress beyond where you are now.

thank you so much for give your quality time and kind suggestions.

Both you and your opponents seem fascinated by the f2 / f7 squares.

Don't be. You have to keep an eye on them, sure, so that there are no cheap mates - but these are cheap mates. In the first place, it takes only a little care to ensure that they don't happen; and in the second place, all the maneuvering necessary to threaten the mate will actually make the putative attacker's position worse (e.g., by bringing the Queen out to where it can be attacked; by moving the knight too often in the opening).

Remember Steinitz (thoroughly discussed in Emmanuel Lasker's Manual of Chess)! An attack must be justified by the position, or it will fail.

So spend more time getting your forces together. Get your guys out - all of them, not just your king-bishop, king-knight and queen! The other guys want to fight too, and can't do it on their initial squares!

For instance, in the third game you posted, 4. Nh3 was a mistake.

4. Nf3 guards against the mate just as well, develops the knight more usefully (it's hitting the centre), prevents ...Qh4 (in case of more attempts at a cheap mate), and is not so vulnerable to being taken by black's light bishop, which would have ruined your K-side pawn structure even if it hadn't threatened mate in one.

thanks

Your first game: 43.h6 is hideous. Why would you ever just let your opponent queen his pawn (with check, no less) when you can easily stop it? 43.Rxg5 followed by 44.Rg7+ wins the pawn. It could be that you saw this but decided you didn't want to give any material back. But just allowing him to queen is far worse, because it's actually giving back a ton of material. You lucked out in that he blundered his queen to you before any damage was done.

When you have an overwhelming material advantage, you should be willing to give a little of it back if it stops your opponent from getting counterplay. It doesn't matter how much more material you have, a win is a win.