How good is it for reals?
Sort:
How good is an increase in ratings of a 16-year-old uncoached player from 900s to 1400s under 3 months time? It be known that no chess theories or references were studied, except chess.com articles and a lot of online blitz. Is there a scope of the rating skyrocketing to the 2000s in the future? If so, how to bring out the complete potential? Please help. Thank you
Jashh760 wrote:
How good is an increase in ratings of a 16-year-old uncoached player from 900s to 1400s under 3 months time? It be known that no chess theories or references were studied, except chess.com articles and a lot of online blitz. Is there a scope of the rating skyrocketing to the 2000s in the future? If so, how to bring out the complete potential? Please help. Thank you
It's very good but what's magical about reaching the 2000's? Everyone else wants to know if they can be a GM.
I see that you have actually been playing for more than a year and have done 200 lessons and about 1300 tactics problems. It's possible that some of that accidentally helped you.
Keep up the good work.
Don't start posing for pictures yet.