Here's a repeat of my #4729 position from five days ago. I'm surprised nobody has posted a valid explanation of why it's illegal. It's not too difficult.
Here's a repeat of my #4729 position from five days ago. I'm surprised nobody has posted a valid explanation of why it's illegal. It's not too difficult.
I hope this position will be a little more challenging. It was submitted as a helpmate in 10 problem (Evgen S. Orlov, 5516 The Ural's Problemist 60 2009). Why is it illegal?
It is illegal because Black's g-pawn couldn't get over the the right!!!!
I hope this position will be a little more challenging. It was submitted as a helpmate in 10 problem (Evgen S. Orlov, 5516 The Ural's Problemist 60 2009). Why is it illegal?
It is illegal because Black's g-pawn couldn't get over the the right!!!!
Also illegal because the coordinates are wrong, because h1 is a dark square, and a1 is a light square! (I just looked at a normal board)
Okay, I have an idea. I know by counting the White pieces that Black captured 7 times (that includes the captures that happen in the process of trading). Let's see if the pawns can capture enough times to reach the positions they are at in the position shown. I'm counting...
Now you are on the right track.
this is a legal position
Yes, easily legal. But we want to see illegal positions that look like they could be legal.
watch:
If you'd like to see it done in 20 moves instead of 29, here it is.
I think this position is illegal if it's white to move.
thats just stalemate
Certainly not a stalemate. Both sides have a legal move available.