Illegal Position Contest!

Sort:
Avatar of MARattigan
ChinaseNukeIncoming wrote:

i like how everybody is ignoring me

So do we.

Avatar of charliewenn
 
Avatar of charliewenn

oops. I messed up the white queen on the black side

Avatar of MARattigan

You could shorten that sentence considerably.

Avatar of Chesspro5747

Great job @Leither123 and @fjdkslagh!

Avatar of Chesspro5747
This position should be illegal with either side to move.
Avatar of Leither123

Retracting either exf6 or f7-f6 blocks the path of one of the bishops.

This reminded me of a position I recently posted, so I'll repost that one if you'd like to see it.

Avatar of Chesspro5747

Great job Leither! Let’s see, last move has to be e7-e6 otherwise the g8 bishop can’t get there. Black’s pawn structure requires 12 captures so every piece has to be used. Before e7-e6, white needs a legal last move too. The king could not have moved from e6, f6, or g6 as he would be in an impossible check. From g5, last move would have to be gxh6 but then the dark squared bishop couldn’t get out. From e5, last move would have to be cxd6 or d6, but then one of the bishops couldn’t get there. bxa3 also fails because then the dark squared bishop can’t get out. That was a nice one, thank you for showing me!

Avatar of Leither123

thumbup

Why is the position legal if 1 black piece is removed, excluding pawns and bishops?

Avatar of Chesspro5747
Leither123 wrote:

Why is the position legal if 1 black piece is removed, excluding pawns and bishops?

I don’t see why, wouldn’t there still be the problem of white not having a legal move on the previous turn?

Avatar of Leither123

One possibility becomes available with the removal of a piece (besides a pawn or bishop) happy.png

Avatar of Chesspro5747
Leither123 wrote:

One possibility becomes available with the removal of a piece (besides a pawn or bishop)

Ohhh I think I see it now, white could have played kxf5 capturing a rook that moved from f7. You’re a genius

Avatar of Leither123
EvinSung wrote:
#8138

What do you guys think about this position? I am guessing that the bLSB could not have reached g8 without causing white's king to remain in check for multiple moves.

Avatar of n9531l1
Leither123 wrote:
EvinSung wrote:
#8138

What do you guys think about this position?

What position is this? If it's #8138, EvinSung posted the same position, but with the a2 pawn at a3, in the Shortest Proof Game thread.

Avatar of ChinaseNukeIncoming

this one?

Avatar of EndgameEnthusiast2357

It's insane how only 8 cross-captures are needed for all 8 pawns to pass each other. That means both sides having 10 bishops is possible.

Avatar of Chesspro5747
ChinaseNukeIncoming wrote:

this one?

Still a bit too obvious, white has three knights but no promoted pawns. You’re in the right direction though.

Avatar of Chesspro5747
This position should be illegal.
Avatar of MARattigan

I wish they'd make them coördinates bigger. I just spent five minutes working on a proof game.

But it's illegal either way up - pretty.

Avatar of n9531l1
Chesspro5747 wrote:
This position should be illegal. (#8177)

It looks illegal to me. After White retracts Ph7-h8=N#, a retraction by the black rook gives an illegal check, and the black king can only retract into an illegal double check.