#1501: Legal. Composer was T.R. Dawson in 1927.
In fact, that position comes with a question: "Specify 2 moves that black must have definitely played." By specifying a move, it means that you identify the piece that moves, the starting and ending squares, if a piece was captured, and if so what type of piece was captured.
Edit: I just read JavierGil's post: he's slightly wrong, there are in fact 2 moves that you can deduce must have been played, not just one.
#1501: Legal. Composer was T.R. Dawson in 1927.
In fact, that position comes with a question: "Specify 2 moves that black must have definitely played." By specifying a move, it means that you identify the piece that moves, the starting and ending squares, if a piece was captured, and if so what type of piece was captured.
Edit: I just read JavierGil's post: he's slightly wrong, there are in fact 2 moves that you can deduce must have been played, not just one.
Really? I'm pretty sure that it's only one...
#1501: Legal. Composer was T.R. Dawson in 1927.
In fact, that position comes with a question: "Specify 2 moves that black must have definitely played." By specifying a move, it means that you identify the piece that moves, the starting and ending squares, if a piece was captured, and if so what type of piece was captured.
Edit: I just read JavierGil's post: he's slightly wrong, there are in fact 2 moves that you can deduce must have been played, not just one.
Really? I'm pretty sure that it's only one...
...Nh3xRg1, and ...Ng1-h3 to get back out again. Simple!
Yeah 117 is illegal. There's nothing to capture the last piece after the Knights have mopped up.
How can you say? You're post 114.
#1501: Legal. Composer was T.R. Dawson in 1927.
In fact, that position comes with a question: "Specify 2 moves that black must have definitely played." By specifying a move, it means that you identify the piece that moves, the starting and ending squares, if a piece was captured, and if so what type of piece was captured.
Edit: I just read JavierGil's post: he's slightly wrong, there are in fact 2 moves that you can deduce must have been played, not just one.
Wait.. is my computer glitching or is yours? 'Cause for me, the post I am posting now is post 1485...
When a post is deleted, the posts after it move one down.
When a post is deleted, the posts after it moves one down.
But it only does that on some computers. Correct? Or is it browsers? Because the post I am posting is #1487.
Why have you corrected my correct grammar to something incorrect? "...posts..." is plural, so "...move..." is correct, no?
Yes, you are posting #1487, but if the comments which have now been deleted (or the account has been deleted) were still there, your comment would be much more highly-numbered. So the post which Remellion was referring to was #1501 when he posted it, but is now less highly-numbered.
Why have you corrected my correct grammar to something incorrect? "...posts..." is plural, so "...move..." is correct, no?
Yes, you are posting #1487, but if the comments which have now been deleted (or the account has been deleted) were still there, your comment would be much more highly-numbered. So the post which Remellion was referring to was #1501 when he posted it, but is now less highly-numbered.
Sorry. I missed something.
Why have you corrected my correct grammar to something incorrect? "...posts..." is plural, so "...move..." is correct, no?
Yes, you are posting #1487, but if the comments which have now been deleted (or the account has been deleted) were still there, your comment would be much more highly-numbered. So the post which Remellion was referring to was #1501 when he posted it, but is now less highly-numbered.
Ok... Thanks for that. I was quite confused for a moment.
a. bxc5#
b. Obviously legal.
Baby.. I'll show you all the potitions you need..
Of course it's legal! Both sides have a king!!!!!!!!!
Yep this is legal,Both colors just move their knights