There's a weak diagonal directing the King. Kind of defeats the purpose :/
Maroczy Bind but not Maroczy Bind?!
There's a weak diagonal directing the King. Kind of defeats the purpose :/
I know, but would is still be a maroczy bind?
Let's say the queens and dsbs are off the board, so nothing to invade on diagonals with
There's a weak diagonal directing the King. Kind of defeats the purpose :/
I know, but would is still be a maroczy bind?
Let's say the queens and dsbs are off the board, so nothing to invade on diagonals with
No, because you don't get much by it. Maroczy Bind is good because in The Sicillian, black always aims for d5 break and so guarding the d5 square is good. But guarding e5?!!
There's a weak diagonal directing the King. Kind of defeats the purpose :/
I know, but would is still be a maroczy bind?
Let's say the queens and dsbs are off the board, so nothing to invade on diagonals with
Sounds like me leaving the kingside exposed
There's a weak diagonal directing the King. Kind of defeats the purpose :/
I know, but would is still be a maroczy bind?
Let's say the queens and dsbs are off the board, so nothing to invade on diagonals with
obviously not, there will be different tactical opportunities as the king is weakened, white cannot follow the same strategy
As some of you probably know, this is a maroczy bind (ignore black's moves)
but what if we do this on the other side of the board?
Is this is still a maroczy bind?