hrb264 wrote:
Isnt 1 F4 considered to be the worst chess opening ever?
No.
The worst chess move EVER!
Sort:
hrb264 wrote:
Isnt 1 F4 considered to be the worst chess opening ever?
Only if your second move is g4.
ha ha I've never seen that one before. Unfortunately on chess.com, there are no takebacks (that I can see), and so sometimes my opponent or I will move our king to some silly square when we in fact wanted to castle. It's pretty obvious.
In FICS, you can takeback. How does one do it here?
I remember great video by GM Roman Dzindzichashvili where he shows even worse move.
If he could have given it 8 question marks, he would have, and could have given reason for every one..."this is absolutely...move...from...the horror show"
[]_ (][) []_
Another disaster went 1. e4, d5; 2. exd5, Qxd5; White intended to play the routine 3. Nc3 but accidentally played 3. Bc3 (illegal) and was forced to retract and play a King move instead (the laws have changed since then). So it finished 3. Ke2, Qe4#.
hrb264 wrote:
Isnt 1 F4 considered to be the worst chess opening ever?
Good enough for Fischer at least once - against Smyslov, too! - and good enough for Lasker in a famous game, so not as bad as all that.
How about this move 1. resigns? Isn't that the absolute worst move?
1 P-Q4?
I beleive there is a term for this, involving a German word that means "accidental mslip" of something like that, meaning the only time anybody would ever do that normally is when they naccidently touch it without a j'adoube, forcing them to make the only legal move for the king.
Also, here's Scholar's and Copycat's:
Conquistador wrote:
1 P-Q4?
This isn't bad at all: the second most common first move (1.d4), with a better win/lose/draw rate for White than 1.e4 (1.P-K4). Judging by your rating, this isn't your point: so why did you put this down?
Masterful_Forfeit wrote:
Doesn't get much worse...
That was the funniest 'attempt' at chess ever.
Is it sad that it made my day?
Probably...
1f4 is Birds opening
Every blunder "is" the worst chess move ever !
My new favourite forum topic.
Flamma_Aquila wrote:
oh my god that is awful
lol thats hilarious. all the queen has to do is attack the pawn and it's mate.
I found a solid refutation of 1. e4!! See and believe!
This is astounding. This is revolutionary! This will change the chess world... forever.
Better start studying that Queen's Gambit!
guys this is in a game too......