What to do when your opponent plays an opening you don't like.

Sort:
LegoPirate
Godspawn wrote:
LegoPirate wrote:
jason17 wrote:
LegoPirate wrote:
jason17 wrote:

I'm reporting you for cheating. I watched your games, and saw you pull this trick on at least 4 unsuspecting online opponents.


You can't do this trick online.


I saw you do it.


You live in Colorado and I live in California. I doubt you would travel to CA just to go to a chess tournament. And I never went to CO to go to a chess tournament.


 He used a telescope...


I doubt he could get access to the Hubble or telescopes at observatories, and others wouldn't be good enough.

jason17
trysts wrote:
jason17 wrote:
LegoPirate wrote:
jason17 wrote:
LegoPirate wrote:
jason17 wrote:

I'm reporting you for cheating. I watched your games, and saw you pull this trick on at least 4 unsuspecting online opponents.


You can't do this trick online.


I saw you do it.


You live in Colorado and I live in California. I doubt you would travel to CA just to go to a chess tournament. And I never went to CO to go to a chess tournament.


I didn't got to Cali. I'm saying I watched you do it in an online game. The mods should be deleting your account any day now.


This is definitely surreal, echecs06! So Jason is saying that Lego somehow made his/her opponent's pieces "disappear" while playing online here? WTH?! Really? You saw this Jason?


Absolutely. I've suspected him of cheating for a long time, but it's nice that he is finally coming clean. Hopefully this thread gets locked soon since we aren't supposed to talk about cheating outside of the cheating forum.

I'm not too surprised. We are dealing with a pirate here Laughing

jason17
Frankdawg wrote:
jason17 wrote:

I'm reporting you for cheating. I watched your games, and saw you pull this trick on at least 4 unsuspecting online opponents.


 

This is actually not cheating. Since he touched his opponents pieces he legally has to move them since the rules are touch move.


Touch move works both ways??! Surprised

Laughing

LegoPirate
jason17 wrote:
trysts wrote:
jason17 wrote:
LegoPirate wrote:
jason17 wrote:
LegoPirate wrote:
jason17 wrote:

I'm reporting you for cheating. I watched your games, and saw you pull this trick on at least 4 unsuspecting online opponents.


You can't do this trick online.


I saw you do it.


You live in Colorado and I live in California. I doubt you would travel to CA just to go to a chess tournament. And I never went to CO to go to a chess tournament.


I didn't got to Cali. I'm saying I watched you do it in an online game. The mods should be deleting your account any day now.


This is definitely surreal, echecs06! So Jason is saying that Lego somehow made his/her opponent's pieces "disappear" while playing online here? WTH?! Really? You saw this Jason?


Absolutely. I've suspected him of cheating for a long time, but it's nice that he is finally coming clean. Hopefully this thread gets locked soon since we aren't supposed to talk about cheating outside of the cheating forum.

I'm not too surprised. We are dealing with a pirate here


At least I'm not a cannibal(like PrawnEatsPrawn).

LegoPirate
jason17 wrote:
Frankdawg wrote:
jason17 wrote:

I'm reporting you for cheating. I watched your games, and saw you pull this trick on at least 4 unsuspecting online opponents.


 

This is actually not cheating. Since he touched his opponents pieces he legally has to move them since the rules are touch move.


Touch move works both ways??!

 


Actually, this would be classified as the touch-take rule.

hrb264

if they play something like the sicilian, or something like that, i immediately assume they're a lot better and know a lot more about chess than i do, and prepare to resign lol

pauix
LegoPirate wrote:

Say you don't like the French Defense:

The Magic Bag Trick works like this: First, you put the bag over the opponent's king and other pieces. Then, when you lift it up, hold the bag tightly so the pieces don't fall out. If the French Defense was played, the position should look somewhat like this:
You now win because your opponent has no king.
 Don't try this in an actual tournament. Only try it in a fun(not a chess event) game with a friend who has a good sense of humor. If you actually try this and get in trouble, I assume no responsibility.

Bah... a French Player would be more upset if you play the Exchange Variation.

Jimvger20

I don't care what anybody says. I enjoyed the posts. I'm trying to get my mother-in-law to disappear.

pwn9

HELLO

dannyhume

Mr. Legoland has demonstrated a historically significant line in chess history.

The particular line he shows of the French Defense is called the Maginot Line, typically played against White's von Bismarck/Blietzkrieg/Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei line (vBBNSDA line) and always losing 100% of the time, without exception.

White always wins this line by accepting Black's unsound French central sacrifices, casually side-stepping the French Defense, and invading & taking over all of Black's territory...these games are decisive miniature victories for White 100% of the time if Black plays the futile French against White's vBBNSDA.

The vBBNSDA line gives White a very powerful initiative out of the opening against any Black Defense, even a non-French defense.  But some of these non-French Defenses effectively wrest the momentum from White's vBBNSDA, beginning in the middlegame.

Black can use the English Defense's Royal Airforce line to neutralize the vBBNSDA attack in the late opening/early middlegame.  Up to nearly 70 years ago, it was thought that the resulting positions were unclear, but likely still favoring White.

However a powerful new line for Black in the middlegame was discovered around that time: the dual-flank-counterattacking Allied Defense.  This consisted of: a) a kingside counterattack sacrificing multiple unstoppable advancing pawns (the D-Day line); and b) a simultaneous queenside attack called the Petroff Winter, a powerful defensive set-up, sacrificing material and territory initially in order to overextend the enemy's army.  With this powerful line, both sides of Black's counter-attacking flanks will mercilessly converge on White's king in the endgame for a decisive victory.     

None of these lines have been seriously played in over 65 years, but they have profoundly influenced the course of chess history.  It's too bad that kids today don't learn or don't remember their chess history.       

RyanGarner
LegoPirate wrote:
PrawnEatsPrawn wrote:

You now win because your opponent has no king.

 

Wrong. Now the best you can do is draw because your opponent has no King.


Your opponent can't play without a king, so he/she has to forfeit.


 Its a draw, you will not be able to checkmate the king, therefore, a draw.

corpsporc
dannyhume wrote:

Mr. Legoland has demonstrated a historically significant line in chess history.

The particular line he shows of the French Defense is called the Maginot Line, typically played against White's von Bismarck/Blietzkrieg/Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei line (vBBNSDA line) and always losing 100% of the time, without exception.

White always wins this line by accepting Black's unsound French central sacrifices, casually side-stepping the French Defense, and invading & taking over all of Black's territory...these games are decisive miniature victories for White 100% of the time if Black plays the futile French against White's vBBNSDA.

The vBBNSDA line gives White a very powerful initiative out of the opening against any Black Defense, even a non-French defense.  But some of these non-French Defenses effectively wrest the momentum from White's vBBNSDA, beginning in the middlegame.

Black can use the English Defense's Royal Airforce line to neutralize the vBBNSDA attack in the late opening/early middlegame.  Up to nearly 70 years ago, it was thought that the resulting positions were unclear, but likely still favoring White.

However a powerful new line for Black in the middlegame was discovered around that time: the dual-flank-counterattacking Allied Defense.  This consisted of: a) a kingside counterattack sacrificing multiple unstoppable advancing pawns (the D-Day line); and b) a simultaneous queenside attack called the Petroff Winter, a powerful defensive set-up, sacrificing material and territory initially in order to overextend the enemy's army.  With this powerful line, both sides of Black's counter-attacking flanks will mercilessly converge on White's king in the endgame for a decisive victory.     

None of these lines have been seriously played in over 65 years, but they have profoundly influenced the course of chess history.  It's too bad that kids today don't learn or don't remember their chess history.       


This was probably the peak of the thread.

helltank

@dannyhume-However, the strong line 21. Nd4! Bd5(also known as the Skarkonzy Turnaround) has been discovered, completely neutralizing the D-Day attack. The Petroff Winter queenside attack will still go on, with an unclear ending, but a brilliant queen sacrifice was unearthed by an analyst of the Skarkonzy Turnaround:Qxh3.

Ben_Dubuque

still when my opponent plays the sicillian I play the Smith and Wesson

helltank
jetfighter13 wrote:

still when my opponent plays the sicillian I play the Smith and Wesson


 I can draw faster than you can.

Ben_Dubuque

Not really...

Ben_Dubuque

Bang

RyanGarner

Now, now lets not start another disagreement here.

PrawnEatsPrawn
RyanGarner wrote:

Now, now lets not start another disagreement here.


 

Yeah, let's agree with each other, about everything.

Ben_Dubuque

well I already shot him, he didnt draw fast enough