Well, the game didn't originally evolve in the confines of European culture/history. It at least goes back to ancient India and the king was the Shah and the Queen was the Vizier. The Queen used to be much less powerful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_(chess)#History
Most Recent
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic
Historically, European monarchs who rose to power would fight alongside their knights, even on front lines. In fact, many kings came into power through their sheer battle/war prowess. But I don't usually see the chess king come out as a strong offender until endgames, when much of the threat has been eliminated. Why do you think they chose to make the chess king piece so weak? And why is his royal counterpart, the queen, chosen as the deadliest offender of the enemy player? I guess the royal couple balances each other out, with the Queen being powerful and the king being indispensable. But still, I personally found it interesting how they decided to make the king the most restricted piece on the board rather that one of the most powerful. Your thoughts?