80% accuracy in a bullet game

Sort:
AngelicNightcore

nothing5566

nice

AngelicNightcore

thx

CuteDragonWings

👏🏻 *standing ovation*

Aftmostcube

Nice

PawnTsunami
DesperateKingWalk wrote:

I bet no one on this thread looked at the game. It was the most awful blunder feast I have ever seen played by both sides in a chess game.

And why you guys put faith into the Chess.com accuracy analysis. I will never know.

It is a useless and misleading stat, that does not show the real accuracy of the game.

The truth of the accuracy of this game is that white was blundering a average of 1.53 pawns a move, and black did even worse. Blundering an average of 1.96 pawns a move.

But right great game.............

Analysis done by a accuarate chess analysis program. Chessbase 17.

The issue with the Chess.com analysis is it will count horrible moves that do not swing the evaluation into a different category as a "mistake" rather than a "blunder". For example, when you are up a queen and rook, blundering your queen still leaves you with a winning advantage, but was obviously a terrible move.

Fire

man had one of each type of move

Worldraider

Good hob

Atychii
ehm42 wrote:

I get 80% accuracy in bullet games all the time! No reason for this post, it's normal!

The guy's rated 1100 elo less than you, what's normal for you isn't gonna be normal for him

AngelicNightcore
Atychii wrote:
ehm42 wrote:

I get 80% accuracy in bullet games all the time! No reason for this post, it's normal!

The guy's rated 1100 elo less than you, what's normal for you isn't gonna be normal for him

thx lol

TTY_500

it gives me 74.9

pixelspots

I'm like 747 in bullet but I dont play bullet almost