The most interesting game I have yet played on this site. I spent a great amount of time calculating variations as I played this game, so it seemed like a good idea to convert them into annotations and show the game here. Unfortunately it was cut short by a blunder, but it was still a fun game to play. There are alternate lines in the moves list if you are interested.
My first analyzed game post
Sort:
Jun 14, 2008
0
#3
Hello,
13...g6 doesn't look right. How are you going to respond to something crude like 14Bh6 Rg8 15 Ng5?
Bye John S
Ummm.. Did you tweak the moves at the end? He did Qc7, not Qc5. Also, he resigned after that Qc7 blunder which loses his queen. There was no Ba6.
That last was a mistake in the movelist that I can't seem to fix. If you read move 47 in the movelist, it does state that the following moves did not occur, but this is easy to miss or misinterpret.
To tonydal: very interesting and correct. Is there a non- Nxg2 line that could work?
To twomove: I suppose I would have to respond by defending f7. This seems to lock up the kingside fairly well, though I suppose the h-pawn could still be pushed. I'll look into this line further if I get a chance.
Thanks for the feedback.
i think on move 25, your oponent could have tried gxh taking the pawn en passant, and could have had beter chances with the attack.
Wow your game shows me how much of chess I do not know. I try to follow alot of paul morphy's games where he builds up but attacks early and forces the opponent to defend with pieces he didn't want to off the back obviously making the game mine. But I have played people that are more of your style which I find to be more appreciative of the game and alot more thought. Thanks I'll go over your game some more.