Forums

accuracy doesn't win games ?

Sort:
Tajh69

i had a lower accuracy in this game


but I still won and won with mate.

Tajh69

tajh69 vs tarabkht

Sydro

It's called a swindle when you get outplayed but manage to trick the opponent.

tygxc

Accuracy does not win games, a single mistake loses the game.

blueemu

The winner of a chess game is usually the player who made the next-to-last blunder.

The loser is the player who made the LAST blunder.

Khnemu_Nehep
blueemu wrote:

The winner of a chess game is usually the player who made the next-to-last blunder.

The loser is the player who made the LAST blunder.

Not true at all. You could blunder your queen in the first few moves and then the opponent "blunders" one minor piece. You'll still lose.

BigChessplayer665

Nope it depends how bad the blunder is

Also it isn't the blunder that makes you loss it is he LOSSING blunder that makes you lose if you make it last

borovicka75
Whar time control was that blunderfest? Eval bar had to be exhausted jumping up and down.
Tajh69
borovicka75 wrote:
Whar time control was that blunderfest? Eval bar had to be exhausted jumping up and down.

it was a 15/10 game, and if you think the eval bar was bad you should see our accuracy rating

polleeess

nice

Elroch

Empirically, it seems rare for the loser to have higher accuracy (except when the win is not on the board).

BigChessplayer665
Elroch wrote:

Empirically, it seems rare for the loser to have higher accuracy (except when the win is not on the board).

I have higher accuracy in my lost games sometimes

Missclicks are the reason usually

MariasWhiteKnight

Yes of course the loser can have higher accuracy.

People just expect far too much from accuracy.

blueemu

You can never sum up a chess game with a single number.

Except maybe 1-0.