Analysed chess.com engine but would like a more human interpretation
Sort:
immortalgamer
Oct 24, 2008
0
#1
Here is the analysed game between myself, and what I consider a very strong player. The computer analysis of the game game said I made no blunders or mistakes, but did have 8 (33%) inaccuracies. So I'm happy with my play, but would like someone with Rybka or Fritz or some engine to tell me if my opponent made any inaccuracies at all? It would be greatly appriciated!
Oct 24, 2008
0
#2
No one? Oh if it wasn't clear. I resigned on the last move because I saw that I was going to lose the knight without proper compensation.
we aren't nice people...
just kiddin' thought you wanted to hear a vioce in the silence...
i think you request too much, no one has the time or knowledge to explain how the opponent could expliot every innacuracy...
i guess the innacuracies were simply because you played a bit illogicaly... making some moves that don't make sense...
Wow why is everyone being mean to this guy, he's just asking for some help.
I'd be glad to help later but I have to go to chess club! =)
Oct 24, 2008
0
#6
You are totally right costelus. I mean why would any other chess player find it helpful to have other people analyse games? (sarcasm)
No one does that:
Andrew Soltis
A.J. Goldsby
John Nunn
Robert Huebner
Who the heck are they? Why would they ever analyse someone elses games when those people could easily do it themselves?
hah, I know the feeling of losing because there were "too many other things to do" besides castling.....maybe you should have done so on move 19, seems like you had a lull to do so instead of that bishop move (??)